Jump to content

User talk:FlightTime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WisemanOnceSaid (talk | contribs) at 22:33, 23 April 2017 (→‎Reverted edit: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


dif tor heh smusma
Click here to leave a new message

User talk:Mlpearc/Top icons User talk:Mlpearc/Header User:Mlpearc/I'm human

Vn-28This user talk page has been Vandalised 28 times.
This user has been blocked from editing Wikipedia 3 times.
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Where this user is, it is 3:32 pm, 11 August 2024 UTC [refresh].



Jul Big Green Instruments

Hello,

I noticed you removed all but vocals for the Infobox portion of the page I have been working on for the music artist Jul Big Green. I now understand that section is not for any instrument the artist is able to play but for what the artist is known for so thank you for informing me of that, however, Jul does regularly perform with the guitar and piano so those should be added back to that section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkkent19 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Clarkkent19:  Done - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please help, I do not understand this here

You saw this edit [1], but then did not see the logic chain of that sentence as self contained and "ironclad". I did that; and now see you are asking for these:[2] and[3]

Humanity currently has no means/technology of testing for "outside of space" by any means whatsoever. And so I request, to understand, by what it may be objectively proven that there is no way to conduct any test to prove or disprove anything of that question unless there exists some (even) hypothetical (though within currently known extensions of known or near future technological capability) means to, directly or indirectly, gather any such direct or indirect data

That we cannot (possibly yet) observe beyond the observable universe because of the fact of light cones is factual seed of this scientific truth. Please advise.Sinsearach (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ [1]
  2. ^ [2]
  3. ^ [3]


@Sinsearach: I am merely saying your edit was not sourced and appeared to be personal knowledge/opinion which is not verifiable. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ah yes no problem, see the observable universe to verify we cannot by any means see beyond what we can see...... so to speak
yes, indeed? also, see the 2 references Sinsearach (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sinsearach: You need to include a reference with your additions/changes, please see Help:Referencing for beginners. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hmmm so then the article on observable universe is not enough or linking it is not enough? i.e. "(this absolute limitation evidenced in: observable universe)" so then..... need to link to something on the external web where someone proves a negative(???)... uhhh... yes... or where an htm is shown someone stating that we cannot see beyond the observable universe? would that be it? Sinsearach (talk) 22:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am not arguing your point, just your edit. - Mlpearc (open channel) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good grief

Hello M. I saw your RFPP for The Joy of Painting. The silliness of the IPs edits justify your request. I have added the article to my watchlist so even of it doesn't get protection there will be other eyes on the situation. Cheers (said in the quiet, melodious tones that Bob favored) MarnetteD|Talk 18:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:28, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IP blocked 3 months if you didn't notice. --NeilN talk to me 18:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: Thanx :) - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My thanks as well @NeilN:. I'm glad to help M. In my Dad's later years he took a class with Ross (who was on one of his teaching tours) and he enjoyed painting a couple pictures. My sister has one of the paintings and I have the other. This brought back those pleasant memories. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 18:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 24.215.168.44

Eddie Albert and I were born on the same day - today - and adding this information to this page was sort of a birthday gift to the both of us. The information came from the Wikipedia article itself about that particular Twilight Zone episode. When I get a chance I will review the referencing information and re-post the information. thank you 24.215.168.44 (talk) 22:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 24.215.168.44 (talk) 22:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Morgan johndavid

What was unverified on "Dazed and Confused" edit? Is someone blocking edits to that page? It appears to be quite substandard and has not changed in years. ALL edits this week have been wiped out. Morgan johndavid (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mlpearc, I'm disputing the reversion on the Dazed and Confused edits. I can think of one error I might have made, but that is readily correctable. The page as it stands does not do the original or the subsequent versions of the song justice, and in reading the page talk, there's been quite a bit of vandalism there over the years. What specifically was unverifiable in your view?

And what do we have to do to get the final "reverted" edit back? Morgan johndavid (talk) 18:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Morgan johndavid: There're too many issues to list, but first, a major re-write is usually discussed first. Also (just picking one), "guitarist Jimmy Page's "The New Yardbirds" for the group's debut album Led Zeppelin", The "New Yardbird's" debut album is called Led Zeppelin ? I've undone my edit, happy editing. - Mlpearc (open channel) 19:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Tejasomina

Hello, the picture resolution was too high to fit in the info box. So, I was putting a thumb there instead. Should I instead provide the resolution when I put the image? I am new to editing wikipedia, so apologies for the frequent reverts. Appreciate your response and guidance on this. Thanks. Tejasomina (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tejasomina: No it's not, the infobox template will automatically adjust the resolution, the thumbnail markup is not used in infoboxes, Display size can be adjusted in user preferences. Please change it back how I adjusted it. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mlpearc: Ok, I will change the image part to how you did it which is (| image = Babu Gogineni 1.jpg).

So, I guess as long as image is modified to the way you adjusted it, I can keep adding extra information to the article without getting into the 3-edit rule, right?

@Tejasomina: See WP:3RR - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hi there, I'm new to wiki editing and noticed you reverted a couple of the edits I made to the "cover" section on the wikipedia page "Echoes (Pink Floyd Song). I added in a popular cover with relevant references. Can you tell me why this was not accepted? I think it's a valid cover which has been spread around social media a lot recently.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FlightTime&oldid=776886004"