User talk:Dbrodbeck

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dbrodbeck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Thank you for this message[1]. Having checked your contributions, is there any special reason you have refrained from passing the same message to User:Synthwave.94? It is absurd to assume that you didn't spot his reverts yet I see don't see any messages at his talk. In addition, why have you even messaged me with a warning when you have become involved? To message both of us is one thing. To message one of us and ignore the other is somewhat WP:TE, but to do all this plus involve yourself is both WP:TE and WP:DE. At this point, I invite you to either self-revert while we discuss it on the talk, and/or deliver the same message to Synthwave. Dumfounded watsD (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened a discussion at the talk page, I invite you to participate. If you honestly think I've done something wrong I suggest you take me to WP:ANI. I didn't give the other user the warning, as I don't tend to template regulars. Dbrodbeck (talk) 23:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That said, you ought to read WP:BOOMERANG before going to ANI. Dbrodbeck (talk) 23:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dumfounded watsD (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding warning somebody about edit warring I guess?. The thread is Dbrodbeck. The discussion is about the topic Seek & Destroy. Thank you. AlexEng^(TALK) 00:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Dbrodbeck (talk) 00:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the double-notice. I thought that the complainant neglected to inform you, but I was just too hasty. AlexEng^(TALK) 00:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I just noticed it myself. Thanks! Dbrodbeck (talk) 00:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry

Season's Greetings, Dbrodbeck!
At this wonderful time of year, I would like to give season’s greetings to all the fellow Wikipedians I have interacted with in the past! May you have a wonderful holiday season! MarnetteD|Talk 16:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks! Ahh this time last year we were wrapping up the Chaneyverse...... Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great memory D. That will always rank as one of the most elaborate hoaxes I've seen - on WikiP or off :-) MarnetteD|Talk 20:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment of Alkaline diet

Alkaline diet, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Insert CleverPhrase Here 04:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Self Coup article

Hi Dbrodbeck, Please see my request in Self Coup article talk page[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpolat (talk • contribs) 12:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Dice

Your recent editing history at Mark Dice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:183:8202:3D81:498A:6554:5A3F:CF9B (talk) 18:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]