Jump to content

Talk:The Star-Ledger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Maccb (talk | contribs) at 00:18, 14 June 2017 (Popular Media). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNew Jersey B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJournalism B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Waiting for information

I have sent in an information request for a list of editors and publishers of their newspaper. The section will be completed shortly. If anyone wants me to get anything else for this article from the paper, please ask. Evan(Salad dressing is the milk of the infidel!) 01:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should mention the paper's appearance in shows like the Sopranos. What do you think? Not sure where we could put it.--Jersey Devil 22:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pretty sure the paper was referenced a number of times in Philip Roth's novels. Roth was born and raised in Newark and it was the paper he grew up with. Pretty sure it is referenced at least inAmerican Pastoral (1997) and possibly some other novels.Maccb (talk) 00:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Star Ledger.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:The Star Ledger.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 24 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:The Star Ledger.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Star-Ledger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Star-Ledger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]