User talk:Magioladitis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 97.117.19.208 (talk) at 19:15, 25 August 2017 (→‎Not hyphenating the compound modifer "light[-]rail" (something), just because "we don't do that"?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

„,Woran arbeiten Sie?‘, wurde Herr K. gefragt. Herr K. antwortete: ,Ich habe viel Mühe, ich bereite meinen nächsten Irrtum vor.“

If you are interested in attending Wikimedia webinars please contact me via Wikipedia email
Corfupedia school project

Request

dear admin,

user Richard.eames is consistently deleting referenced content from the following Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Anti-Corruption_Academy

kindly note he works for the organization.

i request the page so be locked by admins and only allow edits after review by the volunteer community.

thank you

Wikimania 2017

Hey Marios! Too bad you couldn't be with me in Wikimania in Montreal. I am having a great time here and I'm sure you would really enjoy it too. The energy is awesome. Is there anyone here you would like me to say hello to for you? Ftsalamp (talk) 18:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ftsalamp. Thanks for the message!! I wish I was there. I miss my friends. Have you met User:Ladsgroup yet? -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ftsalamp Don't miss the CEE meeting! -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I'm not in Wikimania this year, See you soon o/ Ladsgroupoverleg 15:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ladsgroup That was unexpected! See you soon! -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently sitting next to Legoktm right now in the Hackathon room. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678 I am jealous!!! Have we met in Vienna Hackathon? -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. This is my first ever Hackathon.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678 I knew it was a huge mistake not to come this year in Wikimania. Greetings to all! -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ftsalamp paid me a visit a few minutes again.  :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678 Amazing :) The Canada-Greece communication system works better I would ever imagine. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On Becoming Baby Wise

Hello Magioladitis--

I am Blakenathanweber. My book "On Becoming Babywise" has a wikipedia page. I have been with the authors for 25 years on Babywise. It came to our attention many years ago that one editor named Binksternet (has 215,000 edits) decided to make over 45 edits/entries on our Babywise Wikipedia page roughly 7 years ago. And he has been "guarding" our Wikipedia Babywise page ever since. Many medical professionals, authors, and wikipedia editors have made edits of true fact that are well sourced and Binksternet has removed them all. Three years ago I introduced myself to Binksternet via the talk page and asked him why he placed so many false statements and misleading internet junk on our Babywise wikipedia page and pretends to label them as sourced fact. And here was his response to me:

"The book is a travesty of bad advice, written by a Christian husband/wife team who had worn out the patience of their church. The book was rubber-stamped by a young pediatrician with no reputation. So I don't think you and I can come to an agreement about the topic."

This does not sound like a neutral editor that should be making multiple edits on the given page to which he asserts this biased opinion. Can he be blocked for his bias and placing his personal opinion into his "guarding" of the Babywise wikipedia page?

I would really appreciate your thoughts on to attain a simple, neutral wikipedia page that presents both sides of the issues and not just a one-sided slant filled with personal opinion and internet junk that is "fudged" as a legitimate source and then spun to be taken out of context? Can you help e with this pursuit of truth?

For example, in the last 8 months, Binksternet added a piece to the Babywise Wikipedia page right in the beginning where he quotes one doctors' personal opinion written in an abstract in 1998. He mis-quotes this one doctor's personal opinion (Dr. Matthey Aney) and falsely attributes a formal recommendation statement by the AAP to Dr. Aney's personal opinion. Then Binksternet takes it one step further and falsely spins his own opinion into the paragraph where he states that "the American Academy of Pediatricians has warned against the entire Babywise series."

The AAP has never formally or informally made any statement about Babywise, the authors, or any combination of the two. It is simply Binksternet's opinion and it is very damaging.

To put this in perspective, the AAP is 62,000 licensed pediatricians. To attribute a negative formal statement to the AAP is very damaging.

Baby wise is in her 25th year as the #1 best selling baby sleep guide on earth. Baby wise is currently the #1 best seller on Amazon in the Sleep Disorders, Child Care, Babies & Toddlers, Single Parenting, Breastfeeding, Infants, Twins & Multiples, and Childrens' Health categories. Baby wise was written by a 28 year Pediatrician with a successful private practice in multiples hospitals. Baby wise is endorsed right on the book itself by Pediatricians, Professors of Pediatrics, Pediatric Obstetricians, Pediatric nurses, and Pediatric Neurologists.

Two of the other items that Binksternet will not allow to be edited on the Babywise wikipedia page is to add a section about author Pediatrician Robert Bucknam, M.D. There is literally nothing said in the entire page about Bucknam and Ezzo's book about Bucknam other than briefly naming him (which pretends he never wrote the book when in actuality Dr. Bucknam has been the major factor in 5 complete edits and re-writes since 1993 taking Babywise's internal value from 160 pages originally to today's 279 pages). Binksternet has edited any bio material or sourced fact about Bucknam off the wikipedia page immediately. Also, books are given "external links" on their wikipedia page. Binksternet will not allow Babywise to have her own official website of Babywise.life placed on the Babywise wikipedia page under "external links." Binksternet edits it off the page.

Can you help me in attaining a fair and neutral page on the Wikipedia page based on sourced fact and not personal opinion and false internet junk positioned out of context to mislead the readers as if it were fact? It appears this Binksternet needs to be banned from the Babywise wikipedia page but I leave that up to someone with a lot of experience like yourself. Thank you for your time and consideration. Enjoy your time away — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakenathanweber (talk • contribs) 02:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blakenathanweber, canvassing is not a good idea. You concerns belong on the article's talk page, not here. You clearly have a conflict of interest, so you should not be editing the article directly. You should instead request changes on the talk page using {{request edit}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not hyphenating the compound modifer "light[-]rail" (something), just because "we don't do that"?

Will you please see my proposal at talk:light rail?

Thanks if so, 97.117.19.208 (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC) for now.[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Magioladitis&oldid=797234987"