User talk:Shadowowl
Constructive criticism is welcome. Templates are OK, but don't spam me with Guides for Noobs.
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
09:19:47, 31 August 2017 review of submission by Impress Manchester
Dear ShadowOwl
I have added references where they are available regarding the published works and awards to the write Carl Tighe. The narrative such as his date of birth and where he worked I have also found referenced on the internet but there is little more I can do. While Carl Tighe is not a well known writer he has a substantial publication list and some awards. I think he merits a Wikipedia page but do not know what more I can do than I have now submitted. Should I just delete all narrative and just provide the list of publications with links to evidence of publication - that seems strange to delete any context. Please can you advise me how to proceed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impress Manchester (talk • contribs)
13:04:57, 14 September 2017 review of submission by Brandfog
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandfog (talk • contribs)
hi, We've removed the Wikipedia as a source and left in verifiable sources - including medical journals and industry publications for Dr. Paz' field. please help us understand what else needs to be revised or removed, thank you
Request on 16:51:28, 30 September 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Hta94
Hello, Would you help me to understand why you rejected my input into this Draft? I read your input on that, but I need to understand better. What is the encyclopedic format this Draft did not follow? Why is the problem with "range of independent, reliable, published sources"? I took those sources from the Internet, so they were officially published.
Would you help me with this editing, or just underline the selected text on which I can work again to expend or delete the text. The article is not big, so it will not take much of your time to help on it. Thanks in advance,Hta94 (talk) 16:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hta94 (talk) 16:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Would you check again. I made some corrections in the article, and would like to know your opinion. Is it enough to submit again, or I need to do something else? Waiting for your response. Thanks.Hta94 (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sentences like Natalia Toreeva is continuing using those principles and ideas of the 1920s-1930s movement are good for a museum folder, but need to rewritten to something like Natalia Toreeva continued the principles and ideas of the 1920-1930s movement. -- 08:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Would you check again. I did the fixed, you suggested, and did some restructuring of the Article, so it would be easier to follow the text and References. Thanks for your input! Hta94 (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Reference number 33 leads to a blog, which is unreliable. Regards, 08:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, you rightly wrote that the draft lacked reliable external sources. I had already pointed out on the draft's talk page that there already is an article on the university under its former name. Should I have written that elsewhere? I created two drafts myself, Draft:Guayaquil International Film Festival, and Draft:Philippe Fix. Could you please give me some advise on them? Crotopaxi (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Request on 15:28:10, 3 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Selfmagnet
- Selfmagnet (talk · contribs)
The references I have cited are a journal from Purdue University and a book by the author. They are available for checking the authenticity of the quotes I cited. I have read the rules many times, and am at a loss as to how to satisfy the reviewer. I would love to see what changes I can make to get the submission accepted.