User talk:Shadowowl/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Revieuw of Oh (North Korean defector)

Dear Shadowowl,

Could you please review the Oh (North Korean defector) article and give some more feedback?

Kind Regards,

(Bleibloem (talk) 09:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)).

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shadowowl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Characters of the Zero Escape series has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Characters of the Zero Escape series. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Characters of the Zero Escape series has been accepted

Characters of the Zero Escape series, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Drafts

Anyone who does much work in NPP or AFC will make errors. I suspect that for good reviewers 2% to 5% is about the usual rate, and I don't think anyone can really do better than 1%. I make errors, I think about 2% in both processes, people tell me about some of them. Some are just slips of the mouse i selecting from the list of reasons. There similarly seem to be a few errors in a few of your recent AfC reviews at about the same rate as mine:

You recently rejected Draft:R. K. Chetty Pandipati for the reason " This article contains external links. They are not permitted in the article's body. Use references instead." That's not really a reason for rejecting an AfC. It's the sort of thing that can be easily fixed in mainspace-- wither by removing them or by converting them into references. Since he's an IEEE Fellow, which is unquestionably notable by WP:PROF, I accepted it. It needs further work, like most bios.
You declined Deeft:Hugo_Gottesmann when the content was at this stage for "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources" But every element of significance was well supported, and the article would clearly have passed AfD (he unquestionably meets WP:MUSICIAN -- member of a famous quartet, and prize winning recordings, and other considerations. There were some unreliable sources, but the article did not rely on them. I cleaned it up a little & accepted it, and would have accepted it in the earlier state also. It too needs further work, especially the linking to organization names.
Catha (mythology) also has fully sufficient sources, even though not in our usual format, and should not have been marked as "not supported by sufficient sources" I accepted it also just as it was.
You marked Draft:Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 26) as no-context. But no-context means that one cannot tell what the actual subject is. This is clearly a season of a famous show. The season is in the future, and I doubt there is at this time enough information for an article , but that's not the same thing.
In the other direction, you accepted Tel Haim even though it had no references at all. That's below the minimum standard. There may be, of course.

DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

The first one was in the time I declined articles for that reason. Someone told me that I shouldn't decline for that, and I haven't declined articles for that reason anymore since July/August. Why did I accept Tel Haim? Because I compared the article to more of the articles in the template, like [1], which also doesn't have sources. I thought it was acceptable. Thanks for your explanation. I have no comment on the other 3. I might clicked too fast on those. Regards, -- » Shadowowl | talk 12:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Greece Debt Free

Hello, Shadowowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greece Debt Free".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

05:15:38, 17 February 2018 review of submission by Dylanwhite56


Dylanwhite56 (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


Hi, cleaned up article and requesting re-review. Thanks.Dylanwhite56 (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Rob Niter

Hi Shadowowl I've made corrections to wikipedia article and removed WP:CITEKILL from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rob_Niter Are you able to review? Thank you! Dylanwhite56 (talk) 06:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Bavli

Hi Shadowowl,

I noticed that you have been moving a lot of articles from the mainspace to draft space. It looks like these moves are automated (not sure if they are intentional per-article?). Although in effect it's a "soft deletion" process, there is no deletion rationale. While for one-line articles with just one contributor (usually a new user), there is a policy-based rationale for making such moves, this is not the case for more established articles such as Bavli—which has been edited by a number of established editors, and contains real content. Please note that having no sources isn't in itself a reason for moving an article to AFC or deleting it, especially when there is no dispute about the subject matter's notability. If this move was completely automated (no input from you), it may be worth tweaking the script's criteria.

I have reverted the move, but am afraid that the script might have made more changes that I am not aware of, that have not been reverted.

Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 09:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

08:12:05, 22 March 2018 review of submission by Phantasmagoria65


Phantasmagoria65 (talk) 08:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


Hi there. I'm confused about why my article has been declined due to inadequately reliable sources? The series has been officially announced in multiple entertainment publications and websites-- including the three cited in my original article: Daily Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Deadline Hollywood. I would appreciate your reconsideration and/or explanation. Thanks.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blasenburg (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
More information needed. And perhaps, some third party sources or books.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello, Shadowowl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 16:58:52, 22 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ashlee444


Hello, I am working on an article for Johnny Douglas (record producer) and it was recently declined due to being too dependent on Disogs. I have found many other sources for proof of his notability including articles in billboard and other music magazines. Many of The songs he has written, produced, composed, remixed etc have charted. He has nominated for an notable award with his work for George Michael. All of this has also been cited. I understand wikipedia discogs is not considered a reliable source however, due to his work being mostly of that of the producer and composer, the majority of his proof his found in the liner notes of cds & albums, hence the discogs references. If I remove these references would the article be approved with his billboard magazine, chart information, award information and the artist websites where he is mentioned as working on their work? I do believe this proves notability on its own based on what i have read about music notability. Or is there a way to cite the albums without using discogs? Thank for your help and reviewing the article! Ashlee444 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Ashlee444



Ashlee444 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 6448 has been accepted

NGC 6448, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

talk to !dave 16:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
It was deleted? -- » Shadowowl | talk 14:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Mary's church (Sønderborg) has been accepted

St. Mary's church (Sønderborg), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (St. Mary's church (Sønderborg)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating St. Mary's church (Sønderborg), Shadowowl!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've linked to the Danish-language Wikipedia article.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for approving my draft article. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 17:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please don't delete more of my drafts

They are all actively being worked on. Abyssal (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

They aren't. They have been abandoned for more than 6 months and qualify for WP:G13. Please move your drafts into userspace. -- » Shadowowl | talk 16:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
They are. Abyssal (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Then move them into userspace. I can't see if a page is been worked on when it's inactive for 6 months. -- » Shadowowl | talk 16:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
They're literally almost complete. Once my active bot request is fulfilled they'll be ready for mainspace. Abyssal (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Then at least do a edit into your submissions so they won't appear on the Abandoned drafts list. When the list is updated tomorrow other users will CSD-tag it. -- » Shadowowl | talk 16:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Eh, hopefully I can get a user with bot permissions to do something by then. Abyssal (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
This is the list. Anyways, I edited the pages so they won't appear there.-- » Shadowowl | talk 16:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 6480 has been accepted

NGC 6480, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 7429 has been accepted

NGC 7429, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Behrooz Saffarian

Hi there, Thanks for your review. I think I need your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hossein.kh.nejad (talk • contribs) 13:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. The policy about citing Wikipedia is WP:CIRCULAR. -- » Shadowowl | talk 16:15, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

12:57:04, 3 April 2018 review of submission by Cityloop


Added more notable references. Deleted Youtube as a reference. Cityloop (talk) 12:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

It is in the big queue now. It may take some time before it gets a review again. -- » Shadowowl | talk 16:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ottenby nature reserve has been accepted

Ottenby nature reserve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 2202 has been accepted

NGC 2202, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Thomas Kuzhinapurath

The draft "Thomas Kuzhinapurath" is based on the reliable sources. See, "Encyclopedia of South Indian Literature" ISBN 978-81-261-3740-4 (https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Encyclopaedia_Of_South_Indian_Literature.html?id=t6QpAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y). Pages 268-270 give a rather long account of the life and literary contributions of Thomas Kuzhinapurath.Kindly search Kuzhinapurath within the above said encyclopedia. (https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8qQpAQAAIAAJ&dq=9788126137404&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Kuzhinapurath). More over the citations from you tube are programmes of the famous TV channels in India Doordarsan, Karali People.

These are reliable sources, however, the not reliable sources, the Youtube links, are still there. -- » Shadowowl | talk 10:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

You just depend on the reliable sources and approve the article please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.76.82 (talk) 11:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC) The so-called unreliable sources are removed and reliable sources are added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.76.82 (talk) 12:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MON 89034 (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Too much specs written regarding it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 10:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello, Shadowowl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 10:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

10:16:38, 9 April 2018 review of submission by DavidGSDavies


I have added two citation to the head. I'm afraid I had not appreciated that it was necessary for the head to be sourced when this was a summary of the body of the article which was well documented with citations. I'm not sure that I understand the criticism of containing promotional words. I have made the following change which may help. The term "the Gross Process" was widely used in the 1950's and 60's, when it was the process was thought likely to become widely adopted. This is no longer the case for both technical and economic reasons; I have therefore changed it to "the mono-chloride process".

DavidGSDavies (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hall of Residence, Kelvin Grove (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kerry Raymond was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hall of Residence, Kelvin Grove instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I believe this topic is already covered at TAFE Hall of Residence, Kelvin Grove, so it would be better to expand the existing article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kerry (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:31:27, 9 April 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Chrisdevelop


Draft:Derek Williams (musician)

The Discogs copyright issue arose because I supplied Dr Williams with a draft of my opening introduction for him to verify its accuracy, which he then paraphrased and submitted to Discogs, without realising this would infringe copyright. I am the sole author of the material. Dr Williams has now arranged for this to be removed, so the only copy should now be that on Wikipedia.

Chrisdevelop (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

There is also a large part that seems to be copied from his website. However, the review script is quite buggy when listing copyright violations in the decline reason, and I couldn't add a second site. Is the article copied from the website, or the website from the article? -- » Shadowowl | talk 19:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
If you’re referring to the Home page, then yes, that was the same text that was displayed on Discogs, however that was also removed today following your warning, for identical reasons. The DW website Home page and the Discogs text were both paraphrasing of my Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article was written first, not the other way round. I had asked Dr Williams to verify the intro text and was aware he was using it to update his website, but until your flagging of this issue, it hadn’t occurred to me that this would be tantamount to a copyright violation. The Discogs and derekwilliams.net website have now both been cleaned of this material, so now it is back to being the exclusive property of Wikipedia. Chrisdevelop (talk) 23:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
@Shadowowl: Are you satisfied the copyright problem is now resolved? The decline notice is still up on the page. Thanks! Chrisdevelop (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
The article is resubmitted, and I've left a message for future reviewers (the article is now in the queue, we have a backlog of almost 2000 drafts) that the copyright violation appearing in copyvio-tool is a false positive. The decline reason always stays when resubmitted. -- » Shadowowl | talk 14:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Regards Chrisdevelop (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about NGC 3545B

Hello, Shadowowl,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether NGC 3545B should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 3545B .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Lithopsian (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Långträsk) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Långträsk, Shadowowl!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for all your hard work creating articles!

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Menashiya

Hi, As for your tagging of Menashiyas: I see the Hebrew version cites quite a few sources, perhaps it is an idea to ask for translation from the he.wp first, before deleting the article? Huldra (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

These articles were created by a sockpuppet during a bot run. It is better to WP:TNT it and wait for someone to translate it from he.wp. -- » Shadowowl | talk 10:40, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Tunnskär) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tunnskär, Shadowowl!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

I've searched everywhere for references, but could not find any except maps. -- » Shadowowl | talk 16:18, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Maps are fine, Shadowowl. Was it maps where you got the information you have written in the article so far? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
The stub was translated from nlwiki. I could have added a infobox where the source would be maps. It is a pretty generic article about a generic place which there are not a lot (if there are any) sites to reference. Normally I expand the stub from nlwiki with references from svwiki, but this one had no article there.-- » Shadowowl | talk 17:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Ernst Josef Wiedemann has been accepted

Thomas Ernst Josef Wiedemann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 01:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

21:48:30, 15 April 2018 review of submission by Dreamer14513181

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Thank you for you comment, It helps me improve article with reliable sources as you noted. Please review now.

Dreamer14513181 (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

It is now in the queue, and will get a review within 2 months. -- » Shadowowl | talk 11:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mappleborough Green has been accepted

Mappleborough Green, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Shaft (film series)

Main page: Draft:Shaft (film series)

Just got your feedback on the draft...what part of the references doesn't match up for you? I included plenty of references where they were needed.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 05:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@DisneyMetalhead:, Wikipedia cant be a source for itself. IMDB is unreliable, and Google Searches are just Google Searches, you need to link to a specific page. -- » Shadowowl | talk 11:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@Shadowowl:, I don't think I put Wikipedia as a reference....and really IMDb is actually the equivalent of a Facebook for Hollywood. What references are you talking about on my Shaft film series draft?--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Went ahead and corrected some references. Added new ones as well. That was a very difficult page to create as references regarding some of the films are very slim. Thanks for your help!--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
You say that IMDB is the equivalent of Facebook. Thats why we wont allow it. It is tolerated if it is the only issue. -- » Shadowowl | talk 17:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Takitaki (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please don't use Wikipedia as a reference Also, candidates are not notable until they're elected as per WP:NPOL
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heinrich Grimm has been accepted

Heinrich Grimm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Vexations (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Diyal

Sir I thank you for pointing out the non-reliable sources from my [[2]]. By your help I have corrected it now so I request you to please review it. Thank You in Advance Regards, Don.chaudhry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don.chaudhry (talk • contribs) 10:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lateral Force Transmission in Skeletal Muscle has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lateral Force Transmission in Skeletal Muscle. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 03:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

22:41:26, 24 April 2018 review of submission by Veet Nisha


Hello Shadowowl!

Thank you for reviewing my article on the artist Andrei Rabodzeenko. I read your reasons for rejecting the article: that it "reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article." I would be grateful for a little more specific direction as to what language has that character, as I understand the NPOV policy and tried to use objective language.

Also, your comment says that the article should "refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources." But the article does have four inline citations to external sources (reviews of exhibits), as well as a list of additional third-party press about this artist. So again, I thought that I had observed Wikipedia guidelines, and substantiated the objective significance of this subject.

I look forward to your response and appreciate your guidance.

Sincerely, Veet Nisha (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


Veet Nisha (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lateral Force Transmission in Skeletal Muscle has been accepted

Lateral Force Transmission in Skeletal Muscle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft : Diyal

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Diyal Sir I appreciate your review and the comments on my draft so I have improved it accordingly to you comment so I request you to re review it Thanks Don.chaudhry Don.chaudhry (talk) 06:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I currently don't have access to my computer. I will reply when I get back. Shadowowl on mobile (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nahal Hermon has been accepted

Nahal Hermon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bats of Israel has been accepted

Bats of Israel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft of "Against The Grain"

Thanks for your review. You said: "Nothing really changed since last review. Remove citation 6 till 14 , 16 till 22, 24 till 30 and 32 and resubmit."

I have removed most of those. I left in a couple that provide the page number for a long quotation from the book. This seems appropriate to me but I can remove those if you prefer. I also edited for brevity in a couple of places.

Please let me know if we should make other changes.

Here's the link again... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Against_The_Grain:_A_Deep_History_of_the_Earliest_States

Street.alex (talk) 15:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel R. Schwartz has been accepted

Daniel R. Schwartz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 18:10:12, 7 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by PKiwi


Hi, I've been trying to create a page on Theia, the singer, but it's just been declined because it says You Tube is not a reliable reference. It is only one of the references I supplied, and the link was to official music videos and many of them have more than 40,000 views, which clearly indicates they are from a reputable, established singer, which Theia is. Is this the only reason my submission was rejected? If I delete links to YOu Tube will that help? I don't know how to make the submission suitable? Please help.

PKiwi (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Deleting Youtube refs is a good step. -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

01:03:12, 8 May 2018 review of submission by 2A02:C7D:3E89:BE00:55C3:337C:AC36:9260


References have been flagged as un-verifiable. I beg to differ. We are talking about a World Bank Group publication here. What is more verifiable? 2A02:C7D:3E89:BE00:55C3:337C:AC36:9260 (talk) 01:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Vimeo is a video site, those are unreliable. -- » Shadowowl | talk 06:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 15:02:35, 8 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Genbosmit


In response to reviewer comment: "Facebook isn't a reliable source.": The Facebook Live feed referenced is from the official Facebook page for BBC Technology News, which has over 500,000 followers. The reporter is Michelle Fleury, the BBC's New York business correspondent and a reporter for BBC World News. Fleury has covered American business and economics for more than 10 years. Please reconsider this as a reliable source.

Genbosmit (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

And still it isn't. Facebook is unreliable. -- » Shadowowl | talk 15:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stoneman (band) has been accepted

Stoneman (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

04:21:45, 9 May 2018 review of submission by 203.115.97.156


203.115.97.156 (talk) 04:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

What do you want to say? -- » Shadowowl | talk 15:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Origin Suite

Shadowowl,

From the comment below yours (Draft:Origin Suite), the artist seems to not necessarily need a page. The album has numerous write ups to include a pretty important one by well known critic Brian Morton in the UK (in the Jazz Journal). If that is the only justification for not accepting the article, Bkissin had addressed it. It is truly unclear at this point what are the guidelines. The following is that Bkissin's comment...

Comment: I noticed a part of WP:NALBUM that contradicts my previous decline and comment.

An album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist or ensemble to merit a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline.

Shelyric

@Shelyric: Ok. I have nominated an album/song page for deletion before because the author did not have an article, and it was deleted. so I thought that was the policy. I have reverted my review and will let it over to another reviewer. -- » Shadowowl | talk 15:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

To answer your question...

Yes, Draft:Noor ul Ain was nearly identical (a couple extra sentences but otherwise the same), so I G5'd it. Primefac (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks User:Primefac! -- » Shadowowl | talk 15:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello m author of Livermore Gurdware Sahib Tri-Valley Sikh center

So my question is you moved the article to draft space stating it needs citations which I did include in the references below so what else is needed more ever this is not a business place its a Temple or a place of worship.! Secondly I have added more sources in the references stating the importance pf the topic in media so can you help what Should I do so my article is moved to mainspace.??

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taransingh (talk • contribs) 01:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The problem wasn't entirely the citations. The problem was mostly the broken English and the fact that you moved it to mainspace before it was accepted. -- » Shadowowl | talk 11:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your comment Will try to improve the article and let to know.! Thanks.!

Request on 15:25:43, 11 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 195.99.35.77

HI, I could not submit my article
I do not think it is an advert, it describes who we are and what we do. If you want I am more than happy to send you promotion material to distinguish. We use similar text for our press releases and it has never been an issue before. There are no prices or application links in the article. Can you please let me know which part of the text seemed to be an advert to you? I am more than happy to delete, but please give me some guidance, because me, and the whole team do not understand what is the problem with it.

Much obliged, Greg

195.99.35.77 (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello Greg. A big improvement is to not copy any text from http://startupcampus.hu/en/scu . Also there are promotional parts. Let me take a random part of your submission.

Through the program, we wish to set up an „innovation acceleration system” to find and support the potential of universities and research centres that have not been exploited. The program aims to develop innovative ideas into new enterprises and to accelerate local R&D products and services based on knowledge transfer models and university incubation methodologies. Moreover, it helps young innovators to develop their entrepreneurial skills and broaden their business knowledge.

This is entirely promotional. I do not know what your definition of promotional is, but this is a straight-up ad. And the whole article is like this. I suggest rewriting the article from scratch, and I didn't even mention this version has no references and will not be accepted anyway. Regards, -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Performance Parallex has been accepted

High Performance Parallex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

08:26:24, 13 May 2018 review of submission by Angadjjm


Dear sir I don't cleary understand why the page i submitted was declined. The only comment was youtube is not a reliable source. Agreed but i have also submitted numerous newspaper articles and direct websites links. Please resolve my issue as soon as possible so i can correct my mistakes because This means a lot to me and my family. Thank you Have a nice day Angadjjm (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

As I said in the decline reason, Youtube is a unreliable source. Remove it and resubmit. -- » Shadowowl | talk 07:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Jimmy Corinis article

May I ask if you have noticed that amazon's website is only one of six references I posted about Jimmy Corinis' works?

Please inform me about,

Friendly, --ΑΝώΔυΝος (talk) 08:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

11:54:16, 14 May 2018 review of submission by SusanSoyinka


I am having a great deal of difficulty in amending my article on Albert Reuss to suit your requirements. I have been accused of infringing copyright by quoting from the article https://artuk.org/discover/stories/albert-reuss-the-artist-as-refugee, and some of the wording which originates from that article has been deleted. In fact, I wrote the Art UK article myself, having been commissioned by Art UK to do so. Since that article and my Wikipedia article are about the same subject, it is inevitable that some of the content is similar or even identical. Following advice from one of your editors, I have been in touch with Art UK about releasing my text under an appropriate Creative Commons licence, and this has now been done, so I hope that will resolve the problem. I hope it will now be possible for you to restore most of the content which has been deleted, and accept my article.

However, should there be any further difficulty, I would also like to say that my work is thoroughly researched and my sources are provided. I have carried out a great deal of original research on this artist which has included obtaining copies of much of his lifetime's correspondence from an organisation in Vienna called "basis wien", as well as his biographical information from the Jewish archives in Vienna (IKG). I have also interviewed many people who knew him, and have been in correspondence with his niece in the USA. My intention in writing this article is to bring to the attention of the public the life and work of a much neglected but important artist.

SusanSoyinka (talk) 11:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

14:31:09, 14 May 2018 review of submission by Angadjjm


Sir i have removed the YouTube reference as you said . How much time will it take to the article to move to the main space. Thanks you. Regards. Angad

Angadjjm (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube Delta Campaign has been accepted

Danube Delta Campaign, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 17:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft

Hi actually the draft i made was notable but im just suck at referencing im quite new, the draft was notable as like Dr Disrect and Ninja (streamer).

Hi. If you want to increase the chance that your article is getting accepted, remove source 1, 3 and 6. Those are unreliable sources. -- » Shadowowl | talk 12:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Personale (talk • contribs) 12:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I looked further into the article and saw the following :
he received a major owner on his hometown after his rise to popularity through the Fortnite.[ref] Myth is the sole member picked up by TSM, as he has been signed as the team's captain. because of it TSM is joining the scene of an esport but could very soon, Fortnite Battle Royale is next up for the esports juggernaut..

I don't understand this. What is a major owner on his hometown? What is a esports juggernaut? What does Because of it TSM is joining the scene of an esport but could very soon mean? Are they already a esports team or will they become one very soon? -- » Shadowowl | talk 13:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

ow sorry it was "honor" not owner he was awarded for being the best fortnite player, they are already on the esport, jaggarnaut name of their esports, soon their team TSM will be adding on list fortnite soon according to the source i get, possibly game list. and he is famous with ninja (streamer) this 2018 due to being the best fortnite streamer.
@Shadowowl: I moved it into main page article but it was speedy deleted due to promotion? Can you check my Draft:TSM Myth (streamer) and help thank you in advance. Personale (talk) 06:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
he received a major honor on his hometown after his rise to popularity through the Fortnite.
I still don't understand this, and it may be better to remove this sentence as it is unsourced. -- » Shadowowl | talk 07:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Shadowowl:  Done what's next, actually i asked this draft for help and one perosn said this person doesnt meet notabillity and one article meets deletion. Saints & Sinners Bingo. Personale (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
@Shadowowl: the article Myth (streamer) was recently accepted thanks for all the help. Cheers! Personale (talk) 07:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

18:52:10, 15 May 2018 review of submission by WaltDisneyPixarFanGirl


Hi, Shadowowl! Thank you for your review. I totally understand the comment about Instagram, I deleted the link, even though it was an official instagram of one of the biggest VFX company in the world. That being said, the article is filled with articles from the biggest media in the entertainment industry as IndieWire, most famous Award Academy in the world such as VES, Oscars Qualifying festival such as Sitges Film Festival and the biggest CGI software in the world as Autodesk, and other - or reliable Data Base as IMDb. Please let me know what could be added if needed. WaltDisneyPixarFanGirl (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. If you remove the IMDB reference (IMDB should be in external links section only) the chance the article will be accepted will rise.-- » Shadowowl | talk 10:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deathraiser (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Shadowowl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcin Rygiel (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Second link is dead Needs significant coverage in independent reliable sources to show notability out side of Decapitated (band)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

14:31:28, 17 May 2018 review of submission by SusanSoyinka


Hi, Shadowowl. Please could you respond to the comment I made on your talk page on 14 May. I first submitted my article about Albert Reuss in March, and I am hoping it can now be accepted. This has been a very stressful process. SusanSoyinka (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Arcadiy Harting

Thank you. I have not touched it in years, and thought it had been deleted. I have just re-read it, and I thought it is ready to be submitted. what do you think?BorisG (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

It is submitted and waiting for review. -- » Shadowowl | talk 17:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Booted eagles has been accepted

Booted eagles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadowowl/Archive_4&oldid=842861873"