Jump to content

Talk:Miss Veedol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 47.215.183.159 (talk) at 20:34, 21 October 2017 (It is ridiculous to make the assertion that....: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Merger proposal

I've never seen an aircraft warrant two articles, just because of a change of ownership and name. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is the same aircraft and more often known as "Miss Veedol" which should remain the main article with a mention of the change in name. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images needed

Does anyone have a photo or photos of the original plane, intact or crashed, which would be preferable to the replica image used now on this page and for inclusion on the pilot's page. A photo of the surviving propeller would be useful on these two pages as well. Thanks. Randy Kryn 22:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is ridiculous to make the assertion that....

It is ridiculous to make the assertion that...
"Something is uncertain" needs a SOURCE. Really absurd.
Something is uncertain because There Are Not Any Sources, and hence it is uncertain By Common Sense.
If I say, "Adolf Hitler has never been seen in Antarctica," this is valid because no reliable sources say that he was ever seen there. Only ridiculous sources ever say that he was ever there.47.215.183.159 (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]