User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Welcome to my talk page.

Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
- If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
- If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments.

Thank you, and happy editing!

That "Persistent" Vengaboys Museum

That Vengaboys Museum appears to be Persistent... Keep a eye on the official Vengaboys wiki or Protect it and force Vengaboys Themselves to provide their ID if they want to add any new Edits to their Wiki...

First a weird page came up saying the Museum was under attack, now it has returned to normal... They must be planning something big because this recently popped up on google if you do a search for Vengaboys Museum and you check out their official facebook page and you see a ominous message about their museum creating some kind of "global domination"...

Image and Ominous Message — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.130.80.182 (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Gary little edit

What is your role in editing first hand accounts by an individual to a Wikipedia page to obscure factual first hand account of criminal behavior ? Spookmagook (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Spookmagook: Are you implying that your edits to Gary Little were based on unpublished primary sources? —C.Fred (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am a primary source who met with him was asaulted by him and threatened with false arrest, planting evidence and prison if I disclosed. He was the Asst State Attorney General and. He was serious Spookmagook (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fred yes I am saying that as a primary source having been attacked, and with him demanding sex . When I was able to leave he threatened me as the Washington State Attorney general with false arrest and imprisonment if I disclosed the event Spookmagook (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Spookmagook: Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not the place for you to post first-hand accounts. That goes against our policy of no original research. Further, you have a conflict of interest with the subject due to your interactions and should not edit his article at all. You may request changes at the talk page of the article, but you should not make the changes yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fred this whole page is jury rigged by criminal suppression of source material . When you apply these standards against the manipulation of the story your point allows for continuation of myth building for the story of a very disturbing predation. Oddly very little of this story in Wikipedia is a reflection of the truth. The victims in this case were intimidated, had too much to loose as with the Lakeside boys or disenfranchised as with the street kids this judge raped.

Congrats, rules without methodology in this case are malleable forms of propaganda as is demonstrated in this situation. Spookmagook (talk) 00:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Spookmagook: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a venue for you to tell your perspective of the truth. Please see the essay WP:Verifiability, not truth for more information. —C.Fred (talk) 01:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Karthikeya _https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartikeya

Dear C.Fred,

I am sorry to know that you never identify the links provided in Kartikeya are not related to Murugan- the god of Tamils. First you should not redirect the Murugan page to Karthikeya.

Karthikeya is god worshiped in North India and not related to Tamil god Murugan. Murugan or Murukan is purely tamil god and dont mix up the Dravidian culture to Aryan culture of north. Aryan culture looted our god and say it in different names. But pure Tamil god is only with six names. Provided in the following page. [1]

1. So i request to to delete the re-directing link from Murugan to karthikeya. If you want to write about Karthikeya its well and good. Dont direct the Dravidian god Murugan to that page of god Karthikeya. Read more about Murugan god of Tamils in the above link provided.

My suggestion is to write about Tamil god murugan there should be a page and it is totally different worshiping by Tamils when compared to Karthikeya worship in North India.

2. First the link provided in the "Karthikeya" page is absolute non-sense. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muruga_(film)" It is a regular Tamil cinema with only having the name Muruga. and it is no way related to Murugan god.

3.Second the the link provided in the karthikeya page is second non-sense thing "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karthikeya_(film)" It is a regular Telugu cinema with only have the name Karthikeya

4. The Picture of Murugan god shown as Karthikeya is third non-sense thing shown in that page. It is God Murugan and not karthikeya. Refer the below page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batu_Caves. The picture to removed from karthikeya page or to be renamed as Lord Murugan.

So i request you not to insult the beliefs of Tamils and Tamil god Murugan with title Karthikeya which belongs to only North Indians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayavan.murugan.sadasivam (talk • contribs) 15:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mayavan.murugan.sadasivam: On your points 2 and 3, that's exactly why those templates are there: so somebody looking for those unrelated topics with similar names can find them. Regarding point 1, you'll need to discuss on Talk:Karthikeya to get consensus for a split; there'd been talk of a rename before, which was rejected, but i think people are amenable to the split. As far as the picture, you'd have to discuss that at talk as well. —C.Fred (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No Index

Hello, please help out to take down all discussions of S.Styron. Mostly are indexed on Google. Thats not allowed. User is Global Banned. So do not index the past things. There is no need. Please check all sites and delete everything. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NEW-02 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NEW-02: First, you're adding a protection template to pages that aren't protected. Second, just because a user is global banned, that doesn't mean that every page they've touched should be marked NOINDEX. Third, how does an apparently brand new account know so much? —C.Fred (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brannock High School

Just wanted to let you know I appreciate you finding the last good (maybe?) state for Brannock High School. When I get a chance, I'll dig through and work on the article to see if I can't verify all the info. Operator873^CONNECT 22:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shrek Forever After

Shrek Forever After (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hello C.Fred,

The user Cheikh Didier keeps on editing this page over the past two days, removing the correct link to the director Mike Mitchell and replacing it with the disambiguation page, which I don't like because it leads readers to the wrong page. The user has repeated the performance four times, twice before and after page protection. There should be appropriate action to take against the user who did that. Thanks, Iggy (talk) 13:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Iggy the Swan: It doesn't look like there was any attempt to communicate with him recently, so I've left a message. I'll start watching the article and his user talk page to see what happens next. —C.Fred (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay-okay, let's talk this over

I was merely following the name that's used on the Swedish Wikipedia. It has been 'bout four years since I last studied Swedish, so I am not sure if there is something fishy about the matter, I'll admit. --Prospero One (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Prospero One: When I machine-translated the sv.wiki page, the word "dipped" showed up as well—and I could see terms like the dipping of colors (lowering of a flag to honor somebody/-thing) applying. So, it may be an issue with Google picking the wrong of multiple meanings. The page history is just unnerving enough that I don't want to trust it. This would be a good job for somebody who is up on their Swedish. —C.Fred (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aighty. --Prospero One (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Google was simply wrong. "Stupad" means "fallen in war", and I can think of no Swedish word for "stupid" that sounds similar. You can use the word metaphorically, for instance "stupa i säng" = "fall into bed", but it's always a verb that means "fall over heavily". Perhaps somebody has tricked G Translate - that sometimes happens. --bonadea contributions talk 22:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Yep, that's why I have to be careful with trusting Google translate. Thank you for shedding some light on it. —C.Fred (talk) 22:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain View High School

Hey I want to improve upon the Mountain View High School Wikipedia page, as it is certainly very lacking. I'm trying to put in information about many organizations, but I'm not sure what counts as encyclopedic and what doesn't since the only comment you ususally leave behind after deleting my edits is that my information isn't encyclopedic. Please help!

Infoismymiddlename (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Infoismymiddlename: It's too much detail. It's appropriate to mention that the school has an FBLA chapter. It is reasonable to mention if somebody from the school has won an event at the NLC. It is too much detail to list student officers or membership numbers. —C.Fred (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rizwan Ahmed (Pakistani official)

When the matter stated in the article is not backed by one or two citations but by more than a dozen citations, how can possibly term the info as biased, exaggerated or vague? Kindly look into this. Labeling a page, backed by solid references, with maintenance tags is extremely wrong! Rashid Ghafoor (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rashid Ghafoor: The COI tag was placed because somebody is concerned that you have a conflict of interest with the subject. It is therefore inappropriate for you to remove the tag (logged in or not). —C.Fred (talk) 22:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about the other two maintenance tags?? You are a registered user, how about you look into this?? Having these tags is something extremely disrespectful to the contributions made that have been backed by sources mentioned. Thanks would appreciate if you can do something! Rashid Ghafoor (talk) 22:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rashid Ghafoor: They're still being looked into. —C.Fred (talk) 22:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rashid Ghafoor: Also, it's not the sources (or lack thereof) that are the issue; it's the wording of the text. —C.Fred (talk) 23:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thankyou! Rashid Ghafoor (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Oswald F. Fletcher

Hi Fred; I am Patricia Anne Fletcher. My brother Edward Michael Fletcher and I wish to improve upon the page about Patrick Oswald F. Fletcher. We do not see this as an issue of conflict just that it needs fleshing out. I have left a message on the Talk on the current page however I see the page was put up by WikiProject Saskatchewan and they are shown as semi-active which means I may never get a reply. I am quite willing to show you what we would like to place on the page. I don't think there should be a problem with the material, it just is more complete. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you Pat Sportate (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportate (talk • contribs) 00:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportate: Family members are always deemed to have a conflict of interest. They are too close to the subject to write neutrally. You're correct in placing a request for edits at the talk page of the article; make sure to provide independent reliable sources so other editors can verify the changes. —C.Fred (talk) 00:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kalingaaa

Kalingaaa is a WP:DUCK sock of User:Nsmutte. Please delete this disruptive AFD. Sro23 (talk) 05:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already had a feeling this is some sort of sock, but there is no way for me to know who the master is. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 05:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Garantilotto

Hello C.Fred

Thank you for the feedback regarding my article. I´m new at this so do you mind giving me some advice on how to finish it, please? whats missing etc? Your feedback would be very helpful for me.

Regards Marlode (talk) 08:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]