User talk:Avochelm

\

November 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at White pride.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop attempting to PROD this. It has already been rejected once, and you are not allowed to nominate it a second time. Meters (talk) 07:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   I would like to propose this for deletion. Is this not the proper process? Why are you reverting may changes when I am following process? Avochelm (talk) 07:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not. You blanked the article and then put it up for PROD. I removed the PROD and restored the article. An article may only be PRODDED once. If you think it should be deleted you will have to take it to AFD now. And if you restore the PROD again you may end blocked for edit warring or unconstructive edits. Meters (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROD is clear that the template can be removed if someone objects. You're being WP:POINTy and disruptive. Please stop. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may only remove the PROD if you resolve the issue. You just reverted my changes.

Incorrect. Final warning. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White pride. Meters (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And please see WP:EW too Meters (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:PROD. it may only be placed on a page a single time. Any editor (including the article's creator or the file's uploader) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD. Meters (talk) 07:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will take to AfD. Avochelm (talk) 07:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure you have a valid reason or the criteria at afd. WP:POINTy AfDs are disruptive. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree. I doubt very much that an AFD on this article will succeed. Meters (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article violates Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view Avochelm (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the talk page archives for the article as well as the FAQ on the article's talk page? NPOV is not about treating topics identically. It's about neutrality representing sources' information on a topic. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I were you, I'd be worrying about another Holocaust occuring, not engaging in edit wars on Wikipedia. Avochelm (talk) 07:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to consider that next time you disrespect whites. Avochelm (talk) 07:30, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? EvergreenFir (talk) 07:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to avoid offending whites as you have done so at white pride and other anti-white pages on Wikipedia. We have a violent history. Avochelm (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]