Talk:Brahumdagh Bugti

File:Brahumdagh bugti.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Brahumdagh bugti.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Recent sourced content removal

Please do not remove sourced content from the article repeatedly, before discussion here first. this constitutes edit warring -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 18:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Page title

AbdulBugti moved this page from Brahamdagh Khan Bugti' to Brahumdagh Bugti [1], saying that the original was misspelled. However, the reliable sources use the former spelling, e.g.,

• Brahamdagh Bugti willing to negotiate with govt: BBC, Dawn, 27 August 2015.
• Is Brahamdagh Bugti returning to Pakistan?, Daily Times, 27 June 2016.

or on Google Books [2]. So, I think the page should be renamed back. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

@Mar4d: do you have a view on this? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

I did a little search on this, and it appears Brahumdagh himself spells his name that way. So I guess we may as well stick with that. Mar4d (talk) 05:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brahumdagh Bugti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160118203218/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk:80/national/16-Jan-2016/switzerland-rejects-brahamdagh-bugti-s-asylum-plea to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/national/16-Jan-2016/switzerland-rejects-brahamdagh-bugti-s-asylum-plea

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Previous Vandalism

I've just realized that numerous edits were made prior to my own which removed large chunks of relevant, cited content on Brahmadagh Bugti. I'm going to proceed to undo some of these changes and return the article to its previous status. Von oberstein (talk) 01:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)