Talk:Yogi Adityanath
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yogi Adityanath article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
CM Yogi as a writer.
- Yogi has contributed to the making of the feature film 'Jaag Machander Gorakh Aya'.
- Yogi has written a number of books primarily related to spiritualism and discipline titled 'Hath yog swarup avam sadhana', 'Raj yog swarup avam sadhana', 'Yug Purush Mahant Digvijay Nath', 'Yogi Satkarm', 'Hath yog privitika' and 'Mahayogi Gorakhnath'.
source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/a-peep-into-yogi-adityanath-the-writer/inspiration-behind-the-movie/slideshow/59514016.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swami16 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Adding content in the controversies section
Hi Von oberstein and Raymond3023, I see there is some issue regarding a line in the controversy section. I looked at the source closely. It firstly claims that it were his men saying so and shows a video clip. It does not specify if he was on stage or not and also do not mention if this it went viral or not. I would like to point out that this ia a WP:BLP and thus we have to add information with care. The content seems to me as WP:OR and plus the source itself might not qualify WP:RS for this. I would urge the both of you to discuss this further here if you disagree with my analysis or have some other opinion. Please refrain from edit warring. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 06:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Rayabhari[1] had also removed a lot of those BLP contradictions, and even archives show that mostly one person[2] who was later blocked for socking, "trolling and deception"[3] wanted to retain such a problematic version. I think that we need to rename a few sections and discuss or at least note here before removing anything more. Raymond3023 (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- There is a BBC article which clearly states that Yogi was present on the stage when the statement against Muslim women was made. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-39403778.
Either way, it was a controversial event which Yogi had clear involvement in and should be mentioned as it was highly publicized in Indian media circles after his appointment as Chief Minister. I was also unaware that you could remove legitimate cited content if it was added by sockpuppets and trolls. Von oberstein (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Von oberstein If you read the BBC source you have provided it actually basis it on a ScoopWhoop article which is considered a WP:PUS since it is more of a tabloid. If this indeed was true then it would have been reported in other Indian media outlets which is currently not the case. So as I say your statement that it was an event which Yogi had clear involvement needs a WP:RS and validation per WP:BLP. I have copy-edited some of the content in the controversies section since it was based on a SWAC post which is not considered WP:RS. These edits were removed since it was not legitimate or correctly cited. But one can also revert edits from Socks per WP:DENY. I have left a note on your Talk page and reiterate it here, please discuss it on the article talk page or spend some time in understanding the content/sources before you revert edits or add new contentious content on any article. Also, you cannot make your inferences but merely add what is stated in the source per WP:OR Thanks. 18:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- You might consider Scoopwhoop a tabloid, but the fact checkers at BBC definitely aren't working for a tabloid when they decided the incident was good enough to publish. Not that they'd need to rely on the Scoopwhoop article when the entire incident was taken from a filmed documentary mentioned in https://thewire.in/117655/yogi-adityanath-uttar-pradesh-bjp/. Now, you might not see this documentary as evidence, but others did, and it is disingenuous to suggest that the incident has not been brought up by the media. https://thewire.in/117326/adityanath-uttar-pradesh-bjp-chief-minister-hindutva/ https://qz.com/936492/yogi-adityanath-as-uttar-pradesh-up-cm-bharatiya-janata-party-bjp-is-finally-confident-enough-to-reveal-its-most-venomous-religious-agenda-to-india/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/03/24/meet-the-militant-monk-spreading-islamophobia-in-india/?utm_term=.8ef949444b1f Von oberstein (talk) 03:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Von oberstein If you read the BBC source you have provided it actually basis it on a ScoopWhoop article which is considered a WP:PUS since it is more of a tabloid. If this indeed was true then it would have been reported in other Indian media outlets which is currently not the case. So as I say your statement that it was an event which Yogi had clear involvement needs a WP:RS and validation per WP:BLP. I have copy-edited some of the content in the controversies section since it was based on a SWAC post which is not considered WP:RS. These edits were removed since it was not legitimate or correctly cited. But one can also revert edits from Socks per WP:DENY. I have left a note on your Talk page and reiterate it here, please discuss it on the article talk page or spend some time in understanding the content/sources before you revert edits or add new contentious content on any article. Also, you cannot make your inferences but merely add what is stated in the source per WP:OR Thanks. 18:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Indian politics articles
- Mid-importance Indian politics articles
- Start-Class Indian politics articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian politics articles
- WikiProject India articles