User talk:Astralyu

October 2017

Your recent editing history at Mount Everest shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--regentspark (comment) 23:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tryptofish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Jytdog have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Everest

What's with those edits? Not only are you repeatedly adding a you tube video as a source, you're also replacing the well sourced waugh with the incorrect sikdar. You are currently at 5 reverts and should be blocked so take it easy. --regentspark (comment) 15:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 10:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to block evade, you will be indefinitely blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Astralyu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Was just discussing stuff with this admin. He's abusing his privileges and blocking people at the first notice. Now he's making lists of suspected sockpuppets of mine, which is just stupid. I said one damn thing to them. I haven't done anything wrong. Astralyu (talk) 10:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Was just discussing stuff with this admin. He's abusing his privileges and blocking people at the first notice. Now he's making lists of suspected sockpuppets of mine, which is just stupid. I said one damn thing to them. I haven't done anything wrong. [[User:Astralyu|Astralyu]] ([[User talk:Astralyu#top|talk]]) 10:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Was just discussing stuff with this admin. He's abusing his privileges and blocking people at the first notice. Now he's making lists of suspected sockpuppets of mine, which is just stupid. I said one damn thing to them. I haven't done anything wrong. [[User:Astralyu|Astralyu]] ([[User talk:Astralyu#top|talk]]) 10:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Was just discussing stuff with this admin. He's abusing his privileges and blocking people at the first notice. Now he's making lists of suspected sockpuppets of mine, which is just stupid. I said one damn thing to them. I haven't done anything wrong. [[User:Astralyu|Astralyu]] ([[User talk:Astralyu#top|talk]]) 10:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}