Talk:Duvelisib

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Duvelisib.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pharmacology Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Chemicals Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Patents

I haven't seen a table of patent info in other drug articles, so I'm wondering if it adds relevant info to the article here. It's an article about an experimental drug, so I can see the argument for including it because the topic is different than that of marketed drugs, but I'd like other opinions. Natureium (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very happy to see that gone. It is taken from pubchem which is not necessarily reliable for this subject of patents, and who ever added it to this article made some selection of patents listed in pubchem that is basically OR. Jytdog (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I chopped out the table and left the one sentence explanation. Natureium (talk)

The long and twisty path to Verastem

Robert Forrester, CEO of Verastem, answered some questions about the way Duvelisib ended up at Verastem in the Nov 14, 2017 in the Q&A after his presentation at the Jefferies healthcare conference, and there is more to it than is explained in the wikipedia article. Some of it is hard to make out on the webcast, but it sounds extremely interesting. (Anyone can see the webcast, but this sort of presentation tends to disappear from the webcast after some small number of months.) 108.45.80.41 (talk) 08:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This drug was considered as 'failed' by infinity, as NHL results in the duo study were not as planned. (There is a on almost emotional PR from Infinity on this). The CLL trial was ongoing, and the compound sold to Verastem, for little money. This year, the CLL trial had been found to be successful. Wowbagger2 (talk) 14:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]