Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halifax child sex abuse ring
- Halifax child sex abuse ring (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined a prod with the concern "notability, lack of sources, as per WP:NANP.", as I expect this nomination to be somewhat controversial.
In addition to those reasons, there are WP:BLPCRIME concerns. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Multiple reliable sources document that numerous men sexually abused young girls. Satisfies WP:N and WP:RS No coverups, Edison (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 03:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Notable, widely covered crime. Article needs improvement. BLP issues are trumped by the convictions.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:GNG. The BLP objection is quite absurd. The suspects were tried, found guilty, and their biographic data published by the courts and subsequently by the WP:RS. By the standard raised that child abuse convictions with names should not appear on WP, you may as well delete the Roman Polanski child rape, as clearly he was never convicted (he merely left the United States).XavierItzm (talk) 07:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Per WP:GNG. The article is references. BLP objection is just wrong.BabbaQ (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Limited references, Wikipedia is not a newspaper, 2 references used to fill an entire article is absurd, as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper we cannot provide an article for every single crime when there are little sources and coverage, as per wiki rules it should go.Americatcp (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)