Talk:Condé Nast

Journalism Start‑class High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of mergers and acquisitions by Condé Nast was copied or moved into Condé Nast Publications with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

¡¿‡‡↔==Fair use rationale for Image:He condenast large.gif==

Image:He condenast large.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arstechnica

Poor arstechnica, hope it doesn't end up as a fashion geek web blog. :( --buzlink (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portfolio magazine

Portfolio magazine is closing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.222.231.2 (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update

I just updated the page to reflect the latest CN news and the current magazine landscape. Starfounder (talk) 02:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Starfounder[reply]

Requested move 29 October 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Condé Nast Publications → Condé Nast – The word Publications was officially removed from the name in 2009 by it's parent Advance Publications. This is reflected in Wikipedia on both the Advance Publications page and in the body of the Conde Nast page as well. 69.2.120.11 (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support to reflect name change and majority usage. -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 02:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, agree with rationale by Ohconfucius (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

FFM?

The page uses the acronym FFM in the publication list. Any chance this could be defined somewhere? I have no idea what it means. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.213.2.152 (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following section reads as an ad.

ushering in a new era less reliant on print adverting and increasingly focused on the development of digital platforms, innovative products and new marketing services to generate revenue. --TheNk22 (talk) 20:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Charles Townsend is not the chairman and hasn't been for a while.