User talk:47.219.32.108

March 2018

Hello, I'm ChiveFungi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --ChiveFungi (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Modern display of the Confederate flag, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. If you think the article needs improvement, use its talk page to discuss the matter. If you believe the sources are inadequate, use the reliable sources noticeboard. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 00:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Modern display of the Confederate flag. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Seriously, your only realistic chance of getting any changes made is to stop what you're doing and start discussing instead. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 00:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as done at Modern display of the Confederate flag.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

47.219.32.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not violate the 3 revert rule and was not aware of the rule for edit warring. After the discussion with NewEngland I began discussions on the article's talk page. This was unnecessary as the warning was information enough 47.219.32.108 (talk) 02:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I did not violate the 3 revert rule and was not aware of the rule for edit warring. After the discussion with NewEngland I began discussions on the article's talk page. This was unnecessary as the warning was information enough [[Special:Contributions/47.219.32.108|47.219.32.108]] ([[User talk:47.219.32.108#top|talk]]) 02:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC). |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not violate the 3 revert rule and was not aware of the rule for edit warring. After the discussion with NewEngland I began discussions on the article's talk page. This was unnecessary as the warning was information enough [[Special:Contributions/47.219.32.108|47.219.32.108]] ([[User talk:47.219.32.108#top|talk]]) 02:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC). |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not violate the 3 revert rule and was not aware of the rule for edit warring. After the discussion with NewEngland I began discussions on the article's talk page. This was unnecessary as the warning was information enough [[Special:Contributions/47.219.32.108|47.219.32.108]] ([[User talk:47.219.32.108#top|talk]]) 02:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC). |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.