User talk:JustBerry

Hi and welcome! ^{Purge talkpage}

All the blue words are clickable links.

If you are not quite sure what to do here, please read this first, and do remember to sign your post using four tildes (~~~~).
I'm here to help, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask them. There's no such thing as a stupid question.
Please leave me a talkback or ping me if you respond to a message on your talk page. If you reply on my talk page, then do not worry about leaving a talk back.

Status: Unknown

WP:RETENTION - This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

Notice: This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 365 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. This page is being archived for organization purposes. Please leave a message on my talk page if there is a discussion that needs to be retrieved from my talk page's archives.

Speedy deletion declined: Tradekorea

Hello JustBerry. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tradekorea, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being part of a notable entity indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#CORP, WP:CCSI#ORG). Thank you. So Why 08:04, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: Thanks for the note. Looking at the article's sources, claiming to be the largest business organization by one's own website (kita.org) does not make its notability verifiable. Also, the fourth reference seemed to be simply promoting or advertising the organization (tradeford.com). I suppose notability can be adequately verified via the other two sources? --JustBerry (talk) 15:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability or verifiability is not an issue for A7, just some claim of importance and significance, an explicitly lower standard. Usually, subjects that are part of a larger entity can be merged or redirected to a broader article per WP:ATD. You might want to consider that. Regards So Why 15:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: Before I post an AfD, I want locally hash out its merit as its own article further. The third reference (globaltrade.net) does not verify the subject's notability. However, the volume of trade represented by joins.com seems to suggest the potential for notability. Here's another source: [1]. If you have no further thoughts, I can proceed with posting the AfD. --JustBerry (talk) 15:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At second thought, the extent of our discussion seems to imply the suitability of opening up an AfD. Opened. --JustBerry (talk) 16:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello JustBerry, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Five years of editing

Hey, JustBerry. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 12:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: Thanks! I really appreciate your commemorative efforts. --JustBerry (talk) 23:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - AIV

Er4848 Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline my page

Why u decline my page??? It took me like 17 seconds to write it Rais Cooper (talk) 20:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shelli015

@Oshwah: @MSGJ: User left a "Hey" on both of your talk pages (Special:Contributions/Shelli015) after about a year of no activity and no prior interaction with either of you (even via edit reverts) in the past. Sounds like a duck of... (that's the mystery). (I called both of you to this talk page because I realize the sock is probably waiting for your replies on their talk page. Also, the title was made with Template:noping.) --JustBerry (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User is now blocked. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

at last

after all these years have been called somebody else. Where I come from elsewhere is actually a geographical area so to speak - at last JarrahTree 23:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Sorry, what are you referring to? It is not so clear cut when we have both edited on multiple pages recently. --JustBerry (talk) 23:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

apology - I can be annoyingly obscure on talk pages - the new user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HTIDCam

and then I saw who created the veterinary medicine page and I think the synchronicity is just a little spooky.. Someone else...

I think maybe I need to be careful what I wish for today (at 8+ it is just the beginning)

btw - thank you so much for the link - [2] just brilliant, I can think of some applications for that now that I know it exists - must dig into the deep fathoms and rabbit holes that may well take me JarrahTree 23:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On that page, my edit summary was briefly acknowledging the fact that you had already welcomed the user. Regarding the link, no problem. Cheers, JustBerry (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]