Talk:African Lodge No. 459

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

African diaspora Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a very important article

This was the Lodge that started Prince Hall Masonry. Let's see if we can fix it by rewriting, instead of deletion. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that this is a very important article. However the article needs to be accurate as I visited No 459 recently in London. The 459 number of Africa Lodge refers to the number given to it when constituted in 1784. This number relates to the numeration carried out in 1781. Indeed over the years lodges on the Roll of the Moderns Grand Lodge of England from 1717 to 1813 renumbered its lodges in the following years: 1729, 1740, 1755, 1770, 1780, 1781 and 1792 this was done to fill up gaps left following the removal of any erased lodges from the roll. The Antients or the Athol Grand Lodge from 1752-1813 did not renumber any of their lodges but interestingly re-issued old numbers to new lodges. With the amalgamation of Union of both lodges in 1813 forming the United Grand Lodge of England there need for a new list to be created, the merger and renumbering was then published in 1814. The UGLE again renumbered in 1832 and later on in 1863. Lodges that were created after 1863 are allocated a number from the 1863 re-numbering. 459 was renumbered in 1792 to 370. Interestingly the lodge was erased in 1813 for non payment. I would add that these details have been abstracted from Lanes Masonic records which are accessible online. https://www.dhi.ac.uk/lane/record.php?ID=1301 It is worth mentioning this within the text as I have already received a facebook message mentioning this particular lodge which sadly is no longer extant but warrant itself still exists.

Aquizard 11:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the topic is extremely notable. In creating the article I did base much of the text on one source, but I attempted to rewrite it to avoid copyright violation. It may be that I did not rewrite well enough... but that can be fixed by additional revising, not by deletion. The point is... the first African American Masonic Lodge, from which an entire branch of Freemasonry descends, deserves an article. Blueboar (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please get started on your amendments and I will check back later — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will start revising tonight ... check back in a day or two. Blueboar (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Blueboar: Please take a copy and work on it off-line if it's going to take that long. Let me know when you have done so. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK... I have done a bit more work... is this enough that it no longer can be considered a copyvio? Or do I need to do more? Blueboar (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't open discussion in multiple places. Response is at User talk:Diannaa#African Lodge. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]