Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Lionsbridge FC season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Lionsbridge FC season[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSEASONS and WP:GNG; as a non-professional club, the season does not have automatic notability, and the only two references are not WP:INDEPENDENT. 21.colinthompson (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, failing WP:NSEASONS. Govvy (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 09:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability to merit a stand alone page in Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable search item, routine coverage based on quick Google search. Quidster4040 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG failure and WP:NSEASONS failure. As a semi-professional team it doesn't meet the assumed notability of WP:NSEASONS and WP:GNG has not been demonstrated. Additionally per WP:ROUTINE, routine coverage is not a sufficient basis for an article. Jay eyem (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.