Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Ana Winds FC (SoCal Premier)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Santa Ana Winds FC. There was some discussion of a merge, but as the article is effectively unreferenced any merge would run afoul of CITE and V. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Ana Winds FC (SoCal Premier)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page exists in much better form at Santa Ana Winds FC. This page fails WP:GNG, the club has never played in a WP:FPL, although the previously mentioned club page does meet notability. I wouldn't be opposed to merging this page into Santa Ana Winds FC, as well. 21.colinthompson (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, club fails WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 15:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with existing article. Giant Snowman 09:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. No indication that the parent article passes FOOTYN either, so not sure what a merge would achieve. Fenix down (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The parent article does pass WP:FOOTYN since they qualified for the U.S. Open Cup this year (see 2018 U.S. Open Cup). Otherwise, I agree with your sentiments. 21.colinthompson (talk) 14:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.