Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers for the granting guidelines. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol.
Not done - for now. I am concerned about some of the issues expressed on your talk page in such a short time already, esp. this article and other possible misjudgment of vandalism. Please consider doing some significant accurate vandalism reverts without any incidents and we'll take another look in a couple of months. You will also be required to confirm that you have read and understood ther page at WP:NPP. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Can you comment on what you say is "misjudgement of vandalism"? Re: the PJI article--that was a content dispute that I backed away from. Editor I was engaged with accused me of censoring when they themselves were censoring the article in question (of a hate group). In addition, the Strasserism issue was resolved amicably with the other editor. I'm bold, but not reckless. All said, I'm not sure I understand your reasons for declining fully. Thanks, Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?)21:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the explanations. I said "possible misjudgment of vandalism" - as NPR requires a lot of communication with new users, you will need to ensure that your comments are in context. Please confirm that you have read and understood the page at WP:NPP. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done, probationary, three months. I am concerned that you describe yourself as a 'hardcore Wikipedia inclusionist' which may not be compatible with the objective requirements of New Page Patrolling. When the fixed term expires please apply again and we will review your patrolls. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Sorry, but you have made fewer than 200 mainspace edits in the last 7 years and only 3 edits since 2015 of which this request is one . This does not suggest that you are up to date with the latest developments or that you have a need for, and will use these tools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have made over 500 edits to the Wikipedia mainspace as well as having created many new articles that familiarise myself with what is expected of new pages. I have read the WP:NPP page and also have experience in moving pages. Jonathan35is (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am interested in contributing to Wikipedia by using my own experience with article maintenance and revision to assist with cleaning the backlog of New Articles and giving users direction when making new articles wit valuable content. I believe that my current skillset allows me to make these judgements on new articles to help benefit Wikipedia further. Danielh32 (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - for now. I am concerned about some of the issues expressed on your talk page in such a short time already, esp. this article and other possible misjudgment of vandalism. Please consider doing some significant accurate vandalism reverts without any incidents and we'll take another look in a couple of months. You will also be required to confirm that you have read and understood ther page at WP:NPP. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Done, probationary, three months. I am concerned that you describe yourself as a 'hardcore Wikipedia inclusionist' which may not be compatible with the objective requirements of New Page Patrolling. When the fixed term expires please apply again and we will review your patrolls. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
