Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Doheny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Doheny

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for political office. As always, this is not "inherently" notable in and of itself, but the article makes no credible claim that he has any preexisting notability for other reasons and doesn't demonstrate any strong reason why he could be considered more notable than most other candidates. Bearcat (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, fails WP:POLITICIAN, unsuccessful candidates are rarely notable.--Rusf10 (talk) 03:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. SportingFlyer talk 07:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yep, as per nom, fails WP:POLITICIAN Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Padding the article doesn't disguise the fact that there's nothing there. --Calton | Talk 03:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, Fails Thazinkoko (talk) 10:32, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NPOL. Unsuccessful candidates can be notable but I don't think this one is. Besides, paid editing concerns never help. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 23:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unelected candidates are almost never notable. We really need to purge several such articles from Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while he got lots of coverage in Upstate New York media, it was of the "also ran" variety. Bearian (talk) 15:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.