Talk:2016 Democratic National Committee email leak
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Explain relationship between two pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_National_Committee_cyber_attacks
The hacking started in 2015. The FBI warned D.N.C. in 2015. 2601:14F:8005:B810:55AD:9880:EA67:C083 (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this needs much better clarification and an exact timeline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Two Wrongs (talk • contribs) 17:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
What about this guy?
2601:14F:8005:B810:E0C9:4234:613:D78E (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
A better time line, please
Intelligence agencies knew as early as 2015 that the Russians had penetrated the systems of the Democratic National Committee. How? And they warned DNC who apparently ignored warnings.
Clapped suggested in public on or about May 18, 2016, the political organizations and campaigns were being hacked.
Crowdstrike called in to fix DNC hack in May, exact date?
DNC press release June 14, 2016 and WaPo article same day acknowledging hack.
If this is going to serious piece, it needs better reporting.
2601:14F:8002:CAD2:2CD7:D608:4C8A:CA57 (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
DNC suit against Russia, Trump, and Wikileaks
Suit filed today. This would appear to be the correct article for inclusion.[1] O3000 (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Pffft, still no suit filed alleging that the DNC and the Clinton campaign "conspired to disrupt" the Sanders campaign. Or that the "Swiftboaters" "conspired to disrupt" the Kerry 2004 campaign. Not to mention al the "conspiracies to disrupt" the Gore 2000 campaign. I guess it's all OK except when foreigners are involved? What law(s) are they alleging have been broken? Of course, the Clintons have never accepted bribes from foreigners </sarcasm>. wbm1058 (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- At least I guess this means they will finally have to make all the evidence of the hack public, and allow defense experts the chance to debunk it (or not). wbm1058 (talk) 16:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Anti-hacking and copyright laws. O3000 (talk) 17:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- The correct article for inclusion is probably Democratic National Committee cyber attacks. FallingGravity 17:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, now it has its own article. FallingGravity 17:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
DOJ Indictments of 12 Russian GRU Agents for DNC Hacks
Article needs a big update based off https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download Froo (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Explain relationship between two pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_National_Committee_cyber_attacks
The hacking started in 2015. The FBI warned D.N.C. in 2015. 2601:14F:8005:B810:55AD:9880:EA67:C083 (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
What about this guy?
2601:14F:8005:B810:E0C9:4234:613:D78E (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
A better time line, please
Intelligence agencies knew as early as 2015 that the Russians had penetrated the systems of the Democratic National Committee. How? And they warned DNC who apparently ignored warnings.
Clapped suggested in public on or about May 18, 2016, the political organizations and campaigns were being hacked.
Crowdstrike called in to fix DNC hack in May, exact date?
DNC press release June 14, 2016 and WaPo article same day acknowledging hack.
If this is going to serious piece, it needs better reporting.
2601:14F:8002:CAD2:2CD7:D608:4C8A:CA57 (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
DNC suit against Russia, Trump, and Wikileaks
Suit filed today. This would appear to be the correct article for inclusion.[2] O3000 (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Pffft, still no suit filed alleging that the DNC and the Clinton campaign "conspired to disrupt" the Sanders campaign. Or that the "Swiftboaters" "conspired to disrupt" the Kerry 2004 campaign. Not to mention al the "conspiracies to disrupt" the Gore 2000 campaign. I guess it's all OK except when foreigners are involved? What law(s) are they alleging have been broken? Of course, the Clintons have never accepted bribes from foreigners </sarcasm>. wbm1058 (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- At least I guess this means they will finally have to make all the evidence of the hack public, and allow defense experts the chance to debunk it (or not). wbm1058 (talk) 16:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Anti-hacking and copyright laws. O3000 (talk) 17:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- The correct article for inclusion is probably Democratic National Committee cyber attacks. FallingGravity 17:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, now it has its own article. FallingGravity 17:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
DOJ Indictments of 12 Russian GRU Agents for DNC Hacks
Article needs a big update based off https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download Froo (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Dates need to be more clearly noted in each paragraph throughout this article.
I am asking for more clarity within the article on dates, and all other major events. Under sub-heading : Responsibility, topic, Cybersecurity analysis, this paragraph:
The FBI requested (on what date did they ask for this?), but did not receive, physical access to the DNC servers.[58][59] The FBI did obtain copies of the servers and all the information on them (on what date did they obtain this?), as well as access to forensics, from CrowdStrike, a third-party cybersecurity company that reviewed the DNC servers.[59]
- Start-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- Start-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Computer Security articles
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles