Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise.net (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Premeditated Chaos (talk | contribs) at 05:58, 21 July 2018 (Paradise.net: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete rather than merge - if there's no sources, it's not verifiable, and what are we doing merging unverifiable info into another article? ♠PMC(talk) 05:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't seem to meet tougher WP:NCORP requirements for multiple reliable sig-cov sources. There are some sources on vodafone/clearnet with small bits of paradise.net, but a BEFORE check couldn't pick out anything with decent Sig Cov.

I don't believe that the justification used in the original AfD (some 13 years ago) holds up today.

Its name does bring up a lot of noise, so I attempted to use additional terms to hunt something useful - if someone can find a couple of good sources I'll gladly withdraw

Nosebagbear (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 00:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 00:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 00:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.