Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Research and Popular Service

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No support for deletion. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Centre for Research and Popular Service

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG (with both English and Spanish names) The Banner talk 18:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bolivia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added two Spanish-language references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:RS???? The Banner talk 23:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- None of these sources gives an in-depth description of the organisation. The first is about one of the founders, the second one is just a passing mention. The Banner talk 18:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- It looks to me like a significant para-church organisation. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep since subject is Wikinotable per sources, albeit barely: 2013 and 2016 articles in La Patria, oldest Bolivian newspaper; RTVE report; International Planned Parenthood Federation article. -The Gnome (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I have expect some indepth sources, but a few parties, a passing mention and a description of only a part of their work are not really convincing. The Banner talk 15:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.