User talk:Arjayay

E-mails

You can use "Email this user" in the panel on the left, but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.

Broadcasted

The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B

Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".

An October 2017 search for Broadcast gave over 185,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 60.
Of these 60, 15 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 16 refer to a Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are quotations.

---

---

To Arjayay

Well, Hello, sir. I understand what you mean to say. You don't need to protect Madhubala's Wikipedia from vandalism. I will not make anymore edits as I cannot or may not have that idea of making edits that you and other editors do make. I was making edits only in that Wikipedia only to make it larger than those of Meena Kumari and Suraiya. It was just a time pass, Sir. Manually added signature -Special:Contributions/2409:4063:2316:6c05:f532:c5ce:d3a9:c917 02:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Need to talk

Need to talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:B380:7B8D:F78:7041:BA7F:B121 (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello IP from Guwahati -
Please put new posts at the bottom of the page, with a title, and please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp

As for your "need to talk" - as leaving this post was the only edit you have made using that IP address, I have no idea what you want to talk about - Arjayay (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced edits

Hello, it's Sreeveen. I don't know what the hell are you talking about. You say that i add unsourced edits in Wikipedias. What do you mean to say? Do you mean to say that i am not a good editor. Man, i am only 10 and you need to tell me what i am doing rather than warning me in that way. Before telling me something, ask Von De Leorde what the hell is he doing. Don't try to be over smart. Don't call yourself a responsible editor. You are no one to remove someone's edit without informing him or her. Next time, if you dare to remove my edits, you will have to pay for it. Hope you understand.

Sreeveen (talk) 09:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sreeveen - Please don't make person threats, like the one you have above, or you are likely to be blocked permanently.
As for your edits, one of Wikipedia's principles is verifiability - you need to cite reliable sources {not IMDB, fansites or blogs) to support the information you add. For information on how to cite references, please seeHelp:Referencing for beginners. Any information which is not sourced can/should be deleted. Please try to understand, it is not the deleting editor's responsibility to inform you, it is your responsibility to provide the references when you add things to our articles. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh, hello, don't be over smart. How dare you remove my edits from Wikipedias. You have no right to do so. Don't be so stupid and idiot. If you do it once again, you will have to pay for it. Don't think that i am kidding or threatening you. Threats are not always taken lightly like you are doing. Stop your madness or else i hv to start mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreeveen (talk • contribs) 16:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sock

Yaditiva is the sock of 2409:4063:200b:91da:b5ac:233d:9072:4d17, right? ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Abelmoschus Esculentus looks very likely, but it is not against the rules to edit logged in and logged out, providing the editor is not "gaming the system" - e.g. avoiding 3RR etc - Arjayay (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Wait... Using multiple accounts to bypass 3RR is prohibited and both accounts will be blocked. The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by multiple accounts operated by one editor count together. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:26, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Abelmoschus Esculentus - yes - that's why I said "providing the editor is not "gaming the system" - e.g. avoiding 3RR etc" - Arjayay (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Seems I misinterpret that! No need to open a SPI case. They'll be blocked anyway. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Arjayay

Arjayay, you are really a bastard. Sreeveen (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Sreeveen - your block for making personal attacks has just expired, and this is your first edit - I suggest that you remove it and apologise - Arjayay (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

You cannot do anything, idiot.

@Sreeveen: Do you want an indef block? If not then I suggest you stop personal attacking and harassing fellow Wikipedia editors. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 10:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Re: Page Editing

Arjayay,

Why are you attempting to clean up articles regarding a sport you have no clue about. I am trying to update my local club's Wikipedia entry and you delete it without even a second thought?

Sources that you are looking for in regards to the club are simply not available online, I am quoting directly from the club's history books. It is after all, a local club.

How are small clubs supposed to ever update their pages with 'admins' such as yourself constantly deleting information based on entirely nothing?

I implore you to restore the edit, as it was originally placed.

If not, whatever. We're done here. Enjoy your fake power. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:9308:C158:4C49:8286:E60D:EBC4 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello IP from Ireland - I assume you are talking about Ballymote GAA - I accepted that your edits were made in "good faith" when deleting them.
Wikipedia has several basic principles, including WP:Verifiability - that all information should be verifiable from reliable, published sources. The information does not need to be on-line, but it does need to be published, by a reliable publisher with a reputation for fact-checking, not the organization itself. Local newspapers are often used to provide citations for local organisations, although their reliability is sometimes questioned, whilst local history books can also be used.
Without such sources, we have no idea whether the "information" is true, or not. I appreciate this is difficult for many small organisations, but these rules apply across the whole of Wikipedia, - Arjayay (talk) 16:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Arjayay,

Did you even read the excerpt you deleted? Most of the information is from the late 19th, early 20th centuries. If you can find local sources for that information more power to you. This is a disgrace, if you wish to keep this site UP TO DATE then allow people to provide information about things you know nothing about, and if there is a complaint then remove it. Don't quote sitewide rules when they cannot possibly be applied in any sense of the word based on this particular edit. I suggest you allow IRISH contributors to make a judgement on an IRISH information page edit, rather than quoting a company line and deleting information for the sake of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:9308:C158:4C49:8286:E60D:EBC4 (talk) 16:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately, you have a common misunderstanding about who "should" edit which articles. As you say this is your club, you appear to have a conflict of interest, so it is you who should not be editing the article in any case.
Wikipedia is not interested in where editors are from, what they "know", or what they have been told; it is only interested in what Independent, Reliable Sources have already written about the subject. It is, actually, much easier for an editor without any "insider knowledge" to present that information, from a Neutral point of view, as they only use the verifiable information, without unsourced embellishments.
As for your statement "Don't quote sitewide rules" - that is precisely what they are, sitewide rules, which govern all our articles. - Arjayay (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

What happened to first hand information, handed from club historians - you are blinded by these 'rules' and apply them ridiculously when you know this is not possible in this case. Who is going to update the page then - you? Ok, what can you tell me about the club from 1886 to present day? Conflict of interest... LOL. I'm merely trying to provide Wikipedia, and as a result the wider platform that views the site - information on the club. I live in the locale, but again here you go presuming. It is not MY club, it is a voluntary, community based organisation in Ireland that I happen to have a strong interest in. I would in fact say I'm the PERFECT candidate to edit the page. And HA! Reliable information on Wikipedia? You really have a high opinion of yourself to go with that condescending attitude don't you. Again, I ask you to READ the edit you removed. Where are these 'embellishments' that you claim. It is a first hand, factual history of the club that was clearly lacking. But seeing as you want to hide behind rules and not make any sort of exception, I'm not going to waste any more time on this. I'll be back with sources to back up my facts, and then I'll be here to rub your arrogant face in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:9308:C158:4C49:8286:E60D:EBC4 (talk) 17:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I look forward to reading your sourced additions - Arjayay (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please check religion in nigeria for correct figures

hey! Am trying to put in the correct figures of Nigerian Christians according Pew research. I am a nigeria citizen and i have and know more about Nigeria morethan you So restrained from editing what i added.. For more info check religion in nigeria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankafanchan (talk • contribs) 16:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Dankafanchan Wikipedia is not at all interested in where you are from, or what you "know" it is only interested in what Independent, Reliable Sources have already written about the subject.
The CIA factbook, as cited in the article, is generally considered such a source, is cited in the article, and it clearly states 40%, Pew Research also fairly reliable, and it states 80 Million - whereas YOU keep adding figures, which are NOT supported by the cited sources.
If there are alternative, Independent, Reliable Sources giving the figures you keep adding, then you must cite them, not just change the figures. If you continue entering false figures, as you keep doing, you will end up being blocked. - Arjayay (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please help

Hello , thanks a lot for editing my misspelled words. Please lead me to be a perfect Wikipedian. Can u help me how to create articles in right way,how to write,how to be a profession writing. Victoria tnds (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Victoria tnds - I have just found your post tucked inside another section near the top of the page. Please put new posts at the bottom of the page, and include a section title (use the "Add topic" tab if you don't know how to do that}.
I see that this was your last post, 15 days ago - I suspect you have given up waiting for me by now, but if you still want help, please read WP:Your first article and if you have any questions please come back and ask them here - sorry for the delay - Arjayay (talk) 09:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

My edit on Barisal

Hello, I made an edit on the topic of "Barisal" which is my city - so I know all about it. Once you deleted the edit, I reverted it and put wikipedia link on "Barisal guns" which itself has reliable sources and I thought that is enough. Is that not enough evidence and source? This is a scientific phenomenon which even has an entry in Encyclopedia Britannica and many textbooks, and you are deleting mentioning that phenomenon. This sounds kind of absurd. Please tell me how you/I can revert it back - this information must be in that entry somewhere. Please follow the link on "Barisal guns" on Wiki to find out more. Thanks and please let me know.

Hi DhanshiriM - thanks for your post, which I found near the top of the page. Please put new posts at the bottom of talk pages, and please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
As for the point you raised, I must apologise; your first post at Barisal included no references or links, so I deleted it as unsourced, I thought your second post was exactly the same, but I missed that you changed the quotes i.e. "Barisal Guns" to wikilinks i.e. [[Barisal Guns]]. I have just reinstated your addition, and removed Barisal guns from the "See also" section, as we don't duplicate links used in the article. - apologies again - Arjayay (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Jalpaiguri

About editing Contents About 'JALPAIGURI'.How much do you know about the district and it's people.It has majority of 'Rajbanshi' people who are some how neglected because of political and social reasons.These 'Rajbanshi' community is backward and cheated at multiple occasions.I didn't see a page about 'Rajabnshi' but I saw a page about their language.I don't know what did you mean by reliable.These are the people who never bother themselves about wikipedia.But I do care.How can some source be reliable better than the locals of Jalpaiguri.I do understand what you have said about giving liable sources but the way you deliver it to me is quit rude and as you are British you better get rid of your mastering behaviour.You better keep your nose stick to your own business.

Ashimipi (talk) 06:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Ashimipi
Firstly - Please put new posts at the bottom of talk pages, and add a section title (use add topic if you don't know how to do that manually)
Secondly, do not attack other editors, as you attacked me, or you will very quickly be blocked.
As for your point you appear to have a common misunderstanding about Wikipedia.
Wikipedia has no interest at all, in who you are, where you are from, or what you "know", it is also not interested in who I am, where I am from, or what I "know". Wikipedia is only interested in what Independent, Reliable, Sources have already written about the subject. These sources must also be cited, as references, to support any additions or changes you make to Wikipedia articles.
You say "I don't know what did you mean by reliable." It is very important that you do understand this, please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources which explains this, and WP:Verifiability for the reasons information must be sourced.
"the locals of Jalpaiguri" are not a reliable source, and what they "know" cannot be verified, so any such claims cannot be included in Wikipedia articles.
Please ensure that any future edits you make are supported by proper references - see Help:Referencing for beginners for how to do this
Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

I used to live in Hasimara that was near Jalpaiguri. I really love this place. Chilappata forests, Hasimara, Jalpaiguri, Siliguri.

Madhubala

What's going on with that article? I see all sorts of stuff being added without citations and possibly some edit warring (not sure). Let me know if some admin action is required. --regentspark (comment) 15:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

From Dictionary2015

much appricated on the assisstance for the sin city page and aathe correct fomating infomation. I was able to insert a number of links founde on this club, and greatly appicate your assistance in helping with the correct fomatiing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dictionary2015 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Jim Morrison

In no way am I "vandalizing" this page. I'm merely adding "citations needed". Can we please escalate this issue to the proper people asap? I do not like being threatened when nothing wrong has been done. Thank you.

You are adding large numbers of citation needed tags all falsely dated as July 2012 - as this has been pointed out to you, but you have continued to add these false dates, this is clear disruption. - Arjayay (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Fuck u u fat cunt. Go and die in a hole, mother fucker. You shut the fuck up or I will put you to your grave. Capeach? I 84.45.238.145 (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)