Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbas Hashmi (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Hashmi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The creator claims (at the talk page of the article) that the current version is very different from the one deleted in February. Whereas this is correct (for example, it is much shorter), I still do not see sufficient notability for the person to pass WP:N. Converting speedy to AfD. Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. I've reviewed all the sources, and see nothing but casual namedrops, and quotes from the subject, which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. In no source presented can I find the subject discussed with the "significant coverage" WP:GNG requires. --Saqib (talk) 12:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks WP:SIGCOV to merit an article. Agree with above contributors that the subject only has passing mentions in the references provided. --DBig Xrayᗙ 13:57, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Saqib wrote just what I felt when i first saw this article. In particular, WP:SIGOV is not met here and also per Ymblanter. JC7V-constructive zone 14:47, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Saqib explained.Saff V. (talk) 13:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the reliable sources I used in the article that, in my opinion, clearly cover him significantly, I would say the article deserves to be included in the encyclopedia. Lawrence52 (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Lawrence52 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:GNG Mantosa (talk) 16:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.