Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legends of Callasia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legends of Callasia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Coverage consists only of press releases, questionable sources and otherwise unsuitable sources. If this had any significance, there would have been reviews written in the two years that it has existed now for, but there haven't. Declined PROD. wumbolo ^^^ 14:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable game.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. The provided sources are not in-depth, such as reviews or interviews, and do not contribute to GNG. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.