Jump to content

Talk:Frank Schilling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Soulman (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 9 November 2018 (Jealousy target: Joke). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Frank Schilling is notable

Frank Schilling is a famous domainer widely known in domaining circles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.243.3.126 (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

He may be notable for something. "Domaining" sounds better than cybersquatting, doesn't it? Jonathunder (talk) 12:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unmitigated spam

There were several additions wrt Cybersquatting without wikilinking the (admittedly poor) article by one IP, reverted in as many undo-clicks by another IP. What remains is "domainer" + "commercial registrants" without any cybersquatting. I'm unconvinced that this spam BLP should exist at all, and if it exists, that it should be censored right down to what appears to be various WP:SPA socks editing this page in the direction of "domainer": I've added {{advert}}+{{coi}}. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jealousy target

This guy's page has been nominated for deletion, updated and vandalized on several occasions. Yet the entries on this page mirror other public records and are well documented. I'm troubled by the witch-hunt and lack of dilineation by detractors between cybersquatting (targeting brands) with domaining (investment in generic names). The latter is legitimate. If this guys contributions aren't worth of a wikipedia entry then I'm giving up on editing. (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.21 (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frank? --Soulman (talk) 14:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]