User talk:Luna Santin

Talk – Sandbox – Blog

Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.

When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:

• Use a ==descriptive heading==

• Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages

• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date

If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.

Hello there INTP

Hello, fellow INTP. Thanks for the action on the vandal at IP 85.101.13.128. This one did a lot of damage in a very short period of time. Yours, Famspear 23:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: omg typo alert

Thanks so much! --WinHunter ^(talk) 23:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You block of User: 66.240.49.132

After inserting warnings on the talk page of 66.240.49.132, I have seen that you have temporarly blocked him. I don't know well how blocking of such users is handled here, but I thought you should know that the blocking didn't really work because he is still vandalizing entries (from other users) in his own talk page. Aetherfukz 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing up the issue on my talk page :D. Aetherfukz 23:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Lidle

Hi there; I have no wish to appear unduly vindictive, but apart from vandalising my userpage twice (which I immediately reverted) this user appears to have vandalised at least three other pages within about three minutes. You're the boss, but is just a level three warning enough?--Anthony.bradbury 00:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I have to say, in my personal view that's a reasonable action.--Anthony.bradbury 00:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am User:Melchoirs protege. As soon as he nominates me, I will go for RfA. Then I can knock 'em off for myself.--Anthony.bradbury 00:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is, quite seriously, most kind of you. Thank you very much.--Anthony.bradbury 00:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Icairns

Thanks for reverting my Talk page abuse - much appreciated. Thanks! Ian Cairns 00:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Teachndick

Hi Luna - there is no such thing as "stepping on my toes" - we work for the same evil empire. Its fine that you unblocked him but I suggest you get him to pick a new username, so as to avoid future problems. Rama's arrow 04:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rashied Ali

I see you've worked on this guy before; someone added some massive copyright info, totally overwriting an old versoin; can you wipe the contribution out as copyright? -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 20th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 47	20 November 2006	About the Signpost

One week later, Wikipedia reblocked in mainland China	Military history dominates writing contest
News and notes: Wikibooks donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

OMG thats the fricken funniest unblock reason Ive ever seen! i dont like ebing blocked - ahaha! lol :) Glen 19:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blanking user talk pages

I reported this problem to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents‎ Somebody has been using a series of IP addresses to systematically blank user talk pages--he hit mine User talk:Rjensen a number of times as well as User talk:Hlj User talk:Kablammo and User talk:Luna Santin and probably others

What the targets all have in common is we strongly protested Stevewk who tried repeatedly to remove all the information about the Civil War from the Abraham Lincoln article. Stevewk was given a 3R suspension but may be using sockpuppets to hit editors. Thus he may be using 70.110.174.121 151.197.233.65 70.110.155.238 70.110.174.121 etc. Rjensen 23:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi, I hit 10,000 edits the other day and to commemorate this momentous (?) occasion, I wanted to leave a note to the various people I've run into on Wikipedia that have made an impact on my time here. Just wanted to say thank you for all the work you do around here and for helping me out. I hope your spacebar is still cooperating. =) -- Gogo Dodo 01:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Special:Contributions/67.177.31.91

If that was a good-faith effort, it was totally botched and gave every appearance of vandalism. I have no objection to an unblock. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 20:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking my I.P. address

Hi recently you blocked an IP address which happened to be mine. I'll keep the details short: had a friend over for project, let friend use computer, friend decided to vandalize wikipedia. Just wanted to make sure that there wasn't too much trouble caused and to request that my IP address be unblocked. Thank for your time, and I appologize for any inconvenience caused. Holocron 18:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]