Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research Symbiont Award

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ADP85xzVcQD (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 18 June 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Research Symbiont Award

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Research Symbiont Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Bbb23 (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:25, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It seem verifiable given that there is a primary source for the data, which is the award web page. It is not original research. It does not advertise, merely informing. In fact, it was built on a template for another science award. It is not a hoax. Notability is not a criterion since it is not a biography, not about music, not about musicians, not about a company or corporation, not a fictional topic, and not about web-specific content. Therefore, it does NOT meet the criteria for deletion and should NOT be deleted. It seems there is some sort of voting; unfortunately none of the links supplied describe how to do that. But I clearly vote to keep it. I don't see how it could rightfully be deleted given the stated criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ADP85xzVcQD (talk • contribs) 12:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC) ADP85xzVcQD (talk) 12:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. My signed text was edited by someone else. That editing actually eliminated most of the argument and the structure for the argument and support for the argument--which was based off the criteria for deletion Wikipedia page. While I'm sure it was done in good faith, it is poor form (e.g. one would not open a letter someone wrote addressed to someone else, change it, and put it back in the envelope; likewise, one would not edit an e-mail they were forwarding without disclosing that). I respectfully request that someone revert it. I know how to, and I know I can, revert it myself. But every time I revert I get threatened by an editor that they will delete my account; so I don't feel comfortable doing it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Research_Symbiont_Award&oldid=902402050"