Jump to content

Talk:Deep-submergence vehicle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Naadobea1776 (talk | contribs) at 21:39, 26 June 2019 (→‎Add Graphic). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconShips Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Bathyscaphs are not submarines, in that they have lower mobility, and are built like a balloon, using a liquid hydrocarbon float.

Alvin, seconded to NOAA Woods Hole National Oceanographic Center, is to be replaced with a super Alvin class of DSVs, approaching the depth capabilities of the Trieste class vessels, but with enhanced mobility, and with more manipulation tools as compared to the Alvin class

This whole quote assumes a knowledge of DSV's. Things need to be explained better. An explanation of what a bathyscaphe is, and why one would think it is a submarine would help, rather than a statement that it isn't a submarine. What is Alvin? and what is it's depth capability? What is a Trieste class vessel? Please do not assume that people know what you are talking about, if they did, then they wouldn't come here to look!!!--Alun 07:38, 24 May 2005 (UTC) Doesn't the Royal Navy hase some sort of DSV for sub rescues? 145.253.108.22 12:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In particular the relation between Deep Submergence Vehicle and bathyscaphe is not clear: the same, different, or the second a subclass of the first.--Patrick 09:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update for Deepsea Challenger

Shouldn't this article be updated to include information on the recent Deepsea Challenger dive to Challenger Deep? Harachel22 (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better way to say "DSV/DSRV"

WP's Manual of Style forbids slash constructs like "DSV/DSRV", but I'm not sure which is the best replacement:

  • "DS(R)V" – Would that even be allowed? The MoS isn't always the easiest thing to search.
  • "DSV" – letting it represent both.
  • "DSV or DSRV" or "DSV and DSRV", as needed – a bit long for my taste, so this is my last resort option.
  • Something I haven't thought of.

My preference is the second option, but I worry that some people may not realize that it means both vehicle types since there is a separate article for DSRVs.--Kitsunegami (talk) 06:50, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The R in DSRV stands for rescue. The DSRVs, Mystic, DSRV-1, and Avalon, DSRV-2, are deep submergence vehicles specifically built to rescue crews from stranded submarines. mjv

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Deep-submergence vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Deep-submergence vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep-submergence vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

submersible capable to 14km

The completion of an independent submersible vehicle (ANPA) was reported a few days ago. It is reported to be able to dive to 14km. Modification to accommodate people is said to be possible. <ref></https://rg.ru/2017/12/16/v-rossii-razrabotan-podvodnyj-apparat-rabotaiushchij-na-glubine-14-kilometrov.ref> Freshchips (talk) 03:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put something in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshchips (talkcontribs) 03:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all references to the ANPA. I couldn't find any other serious sources to even confirm that such an object exists at all, and in any case it's described as being an unmanned vehicle, which makes it an ROV (not a DSV) so it doesn't belong here anyway. Also, a dive to 14000 m would be an amazing accomplishment to say the least! -- bornLoser (talk) 02:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add Graphic

I have a declared COI on a related subject. This graphic seems like it would be a nice addition to this page. I suggest to add the following to the end of the Deepest explorers section:

Extended content

Worldwide Deep Submergence Vehicles

Thanks, Naadobea1776 (talk) 16:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Naadobea1776:  Done Orville1974talk 17:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Orville1974: Thank you! Naadobea1776 (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]