Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trilion Quality Systems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Trilion Quality Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
At present, the article is almost entirely sourced to the company's website, or that of a partner company. There are a few other refs to documents partly written by people associated with the company, and a couple of other articles that don't actually mention the company, or that mention their products in passing but don't discuss the company - in short, nothing that meets WP:CORPDEPTH. I looked for independent sourcing, and failed to find anything giving significant coverage, so the subject fails WP:NCORP. I also note that this article is the author's first substantive contribution, having made just enough minor edits to get autoconfirmed earlier this month. GirthSummit (blether) 18:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 18:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 18:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I do not believe this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The article has been created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest and is just a free advertisement for the company. I note that an article with this name has previously been deleted, and am amazed at the competency of the "newbie" editor. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.