Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aybars İbak

Aybars İbak

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are all very short pieces that have no by-line in sources that seem to be mostly user-generated such as imdb, haber life, kimnereli where you can email your bio for publication etc etc. The sites seem to have no staff. This is a case of way WP:TOOSOON. Nothing in a before search of interest Dom from Paris (talk) 12:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 August 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it is not a valid reason for me because there is no such thing as every news headline will be long, and when it comes to IMDb, there may be only known people in IMDb. Paulahted^(T) 8 August 2019 (UTC) — Paulahted (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Paulahted: the above comment is your only edit to Wikipedia – you joined Wikipedia just to comment on this AfD? Richard3120 (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the sources are the same biographical paragraph, he does't pass WP:GNG he maybe notable someday but he's not notable now. Whispering^(t) 15:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem to be notable. The sources are unreliable and they do not help with establishing the subject's notability. He does not pass WP:GNG, at least for now. Keivan.f^Talk 06:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Resources seem to be sufficient. It's okay to stay. What is mentioned in the news is that the person (child) is slowly becoming a nationally recognized child. Kimnereli.net is a site where only well-known people are present and their personal information is provided. Sites like: famousbirthdays.com The information available by e-mail is an option for lesser-known people, and in such cases there is the “special request” sign in parentheses. Prianhana^(T) 7:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC) — Prianhana (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep editors of kimnereli style sites find things like birth date, height, biography from the internet. If they can’t find. E-mail option is available to receive e-mail from people who know it or from the manager of that famous name In very rare cases famous people can also e-mail. Huriyeot45^(T) 9:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC) — Huriyeot45 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I can't see anything negative on the referenced sites. Only known, well-known people can be found on Imdb and kimnereli sites.Tarikmarulanson 12:29, 9 August 2019 (UTC) — Tarikmarulanson (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment to closing administrator: WP:MEATPUPPET alert – every one of the "keep" voters has joined Wikipedia in the last 24 hours, and all of them by coincidence have decided to use the same font for their signatures. Richard3120 (talk) 13:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I reviewed the given sources There are no problems in the sources. Fikeithomas 20:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC) — Fikeithomas (talk •contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Sockpuppet contributions struck per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fikeithomas. Uncle G (talk) 18:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as not currently meeting WP:NBIO, created by a sock and supported by a flock of sox. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There seems to be some problems with the sources, but I think the person is worth notable.User:Kimfromkorea (talk) 10:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC) blocked sock Dom from Paris (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Definitely WP:TOOSOON. ZettaComposer (talk) 00:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep This person maybe a notable.Correcting the sources may not be a problem.Resources can be corrected.176.35.78.20 (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]