Jump to content

Talk:Libertarianism in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Adam9389 (talk | contribs) at 21:47, 5 September 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Can't repeat policy violations of Libertarianism article in this one

I.e., violating policies regarding WP:Verifiability, WP:NPOV, WP:No Original Research, and of course purging the various left libertarian/libertarian socialist groups. You guys play with it for a while and then I (or others) will come in at some point and clean up the worst of it. :-) CarolMooreDC (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal (Libertarian movement in the U.S. into here)

I second. I didn't even realize there were two, though I have them both bookmarked. Go for it! CarolMooreDC (talk) 19:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to do it. Hearing no dissent, will do so soon. CarolMooreDC (talk) 00:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hearing no objections, Gonna do it!! Note this is per similarly named articles about UK and SA. CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unclear what the target was, but I've placed a tag. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 16:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The merge was Libertarian movement in the U.S. into t his article, and I did it. (Copied to archive and will delete this after you have chance to read.) CarolMooreDC (talk) 04:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref'd info only please

Since the current Libertarianism article (or the talk page or archives) contains lots of info to ref statements, there's no reason to include non ref'd ones. On the other hand, if someone puts up a tag that it should be ref'd and no one does so, it can be removed. CarolMooreDC (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. Incidentally there is great room for expansion of this article with high quality referenced material. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of well-cited info

Not editing for ~two months is probably not going to change the fact that the discussion of left-libertarianism in articles on "libertarianism" has been deemed valid in MULTIPLE talk page RfCs (including:here, here, here, and here, the results of which can be seen in this diff). I'd submit that a protection on the Libertarianism page should not be taken as an indicator to restart that battleground topic over here.

Including information about anarchism and minarchism is NOT mutually exclusive of the existing information. If any editors desire to DELETE well-cited info, then present a decent WP rationale, please. Thanks. BigK HeX (talk) 04:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing#Refusal_to_get_the_point still rules. :-( Not looking forward to February! CarolMooreDC (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Although, I have no doubt that the end results would be the same. BigK HeX (talk) 13:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Libertarianism in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Libertarianism in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Libertarianism in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Young Americans for Liberty

Young Americans for Liberty and Students for Liberty deserve a mention in this article. Benjamin (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. North8000 (talk) 04:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Libertarianism in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was / is an exchange at my talk page regarding this article

There was / is an exchange at my talk page regarding this article. North8000 (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

POV concern

Does this statement "Although the word libertarian continues to be widely used to refer to anti-state socialists internationally, its meaning in the United States has deviated from its political origins to the extent that the common meaning of libertarian in the United States is different from elsewhere" really belong immediately after the lead sentence of the article? It reads, almost glaringly, like a poorly veiled POV attempt to scream to the reader, "This is not real libertarianism! No, no, no!" It seems the format would be cleaner and better suited if that statement was inserted as the final paragraph of the header, rather than as its lead.

--Adam9389 (talk) 14:45, 05 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]