User talk:Asarelah
Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page, not the top
Please stop removing the Categories belonging to Yemenite Rabbis
User:Asarelah, I have noticed where you have been removing the designation of "rabbi" in the categories of certain well-known rabbis, such as here and here. This is tantamount to vandalism or disruptive editing, and I must ask you kindly to stop doing so, or you will be reported.Davidbena (talk) 23:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- I noticed where you have ignored my message, as you can see here. You may think that having a category of "Yemenite rabbis" is redundant, but what you fail to realise is that not all Yemenite Jews are rabbis and, therefore, when one wishes to look specifically for a Yemenite rabbi, placing them in an all-inclusive category makes searching for them harder to do. The purpose of a category is to make it easy to find a specific topic.Davidbena (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- I clipped the redundant category of Yemenite Rabbis and Yemenite Jews because they were already in the category of Yemenite Orthodox Rabbis, which is a subcategory of Yemenite Rabbis and Yemenite Jews. Asarelah (talk)
- If that was truly your intent and purpose, then all is fine. Sorry for the misunderstanding. So, the rabbis are listed under the category, "Yemenite Orthodox rabbis." Great! Please accept my apologies to you.Davidbena (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- I clipped the redundant category of Yemenite Rabbis and Yemenite Jews because they were already in the category of Yemenite Orthodox Rabbis, which is a subcategory of Yemenite Rabbis and Yemenite Jews. Asarelah (talk)
- I noticed where you have ignored my message, as you can see here. You may think that having a category of "Yemenite rabbis" is redundant, but what you fail to realise is that not all Yemenite Jews are rabbis and, therefore, when one wishes to look specifically for a Yemenite rabbi, placing them in an all-inclusive category makes searching for them harder to do. The purpose of a category is to make it easy to find a specific topic.Davidbena (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The file File:Opechancanough.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Cppying within Wikipeda
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please do this. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Hannah Witneg concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hannah Witneg, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Queen Emma
- See Emma.
A depiction of Emma exists, and it is in the public domain — made by François-Séraphin Delpech. The image. Emma is called Berthe here, but the inscription says this is the depiction of Rudolph's wife. — Mychele (talk)
