User talk:Sulfurboy

This is Sulfurboy's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28: 7 days

Please do the following when posting on my page(I will ignore your comment if you don't follow these simple rules):

1) Post new sections at the bottom of the page.

2) PLEASE LINK TO YOUR ARTICLE, I go through a myriad of pages a day, I won't know what you're talking about unless you link your article.

3) Please don't request me to re-review your article unless I've specifically asked you to do so. AfC is incredibly backlogged and someone will get to it when they can.

I welcome anyone to comment or reply to others on my page, but please be kind and if their post breaks one of the above three rules, please ignore them as well.

PLease, look my article

Hi, my Sulfurboy, how are you?

I already fixed the article and removed the words that were not neutral. Please review it and accept it since I lasted many hours doing it. Consider my request. I also take into account any advice from you and whether I should remove or put words. This is the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Emil_Cerda

Eltiguere300 (talk) 23:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Eltiguere300[reply]

AfC reviews

Feel free to mark articles that you move to the mainspace through AfC as reviewed, especially articles which unambiguously meet an SNG. Although if you do so, make sure that they're properly tagged with all relevant WikiProject banners. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill I'll do that for sure for the ones that are SNG, but if you don't mind I think for the GNG ones I'd still like it to be seen by NPP in case I missed something glaring, at least until I get back in the groove of things from my extended absensce. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, and if it's a subjective SNG (like NACTOR or NACADEMIC) feel free to also send those for a second review, but for clear yes-or-no SNGs (like most of NSPORTS) it's going to almost always be unnecessary. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, thought I'd run this idea by you. I still don't feel comfortable reviewing my own pages that I approve. Feels a little too much like a fox watching the hen house. So instead I'm just going to keep a rough count of articles I approve in a day and then go review at least that many articles in NPP (and a few more) so that at least my contribution to the NPP queue is a net negative. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a good idea, although I'm not sure I see why you feel more uncertain about articles you approve out of AfC than articles that you come across at NPP. Unless you're making significant edits to the AfC articles in order to bring them to an acceptable state, there really isn't any conflict of interest. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds

Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Submission declined on 12 February 2020 by Sulfurboy (talk).

First, thank you for reviewing this submission! That is sincere, and I'm definitely not mad, just trying to understand.

Please try to help me understand clearly what you are saying?

So do you feel that because the other co-author of the book is mentioned in greater detail (James "Buster" Douglas, the co-author being mentioned less is not notable?

I disagree with the passing title because one co-author is greater than the other, should not delineate the fact that this book was co-created by Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds. This book, "Buster's Backyard Bar-B-Q," would not have been created without both authors. (actually Tony Reynolds was the original creator...but that's not going in here.)

Although I will agree to disagree, feeling that being co-author of a book mentioned in numerous national publications is not just a "passing" mention. If Reynolds was a ghost-writer, I would most likely agree, but even ghost-writers get credit in Wiki.

FOX NEWS: https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/buster-douglas-knockout-bbq

Second, before this is updated again

Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds is the primary feature of the story (and his creation), but of course, President Reagan will over shadow Reynolds in these stories.

https://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/reagan-hologram-real-planned-rnc-debut-203919642--election.html

https://deadline.com/2012/08/reagan-hologram-developer-didnt-want-to-distract-from-mitt-romney-report-327668/

http://www.msnbc.com/the-ed-show/reagan-hologram-resurrected

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/08/report-gop-nixed-reagan-hologram-080532

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/08/ronald-reagan-and-the-case-of-the-missing-hologram/261838/

What do you think?

Akickincrowd (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft for Review, Young Henrys

Hi Sulfurboy,

Thanks so much for reviewing my draft and suggesting edits. As requested I have added reliable sources, including a journal article, published book and SBS news feature. I would really appreciate if you could re-review the article. Thank you for your interest and time. Draft:Young Henrys

OleWriter2020 (talk) 02:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to resubmit the article and then I can approve it. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:33, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sulfurboy, my apologies I thought I had already. It has now been resubmitted. Thank you so much. OleWriter2020 (talk) 09:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft for Review, Didier Gazagnadou

Dear Sulfurboy, I read carefully what you suggested to improve the page I wrote about D. Gazagnadou: Draft:Didier Gazagnadou and I would like to thank you.

For the notability issue (for academics), I just added Authority control that constitutes to my opinion published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Moreover, D. Gazagnadou has been cited in Nature (journal).

Actually D. Gazagnadou belongs to famous professors from University of Vincennes in Saint-Denis where Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Lacan, Bernard Maris, Helene Cixous and many others still teach or taught.

I would really appreciate if you could re-review the article. Thanks for your time.

Etoiledeneige (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

God father 2020 movie

May I know why God father 2020 edits declined by you Firstclap (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of draft on Alex Jawdokimov

Dear Sulfurboy, Thank you for reviewing my draft on Jawdokimov. Please check his prominence by doing a Wikipedia search on his surname. You will see that he is mentioned as Alex or Alexei Jawdokimov in several existing Wikipedia articles. Please let me know if I should refer to these articles in my draft in order to prove his prominence. I already referred to his filmography on IMDb. I have been following his work for some time. Although I did not know him in person, when I learnt about his death, I thought he would deserve an article. I don’t know the exact date of his birth and his death, but I’m trying find it out in order to make that information more precise. Best regards, Budabe Budabe (talk) 19:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend reading the provided links in the message about the draft's decline. There are links to explain what is needed to show notability along with what is considered a good source to use. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review article again

Hi my Sulfurboy, I'm new to this wikipedia, I fixed the article you denied me. I arranged well and left the article as natural as possible. Take a look please, and sorry for wasting your time but I want you to consider my article since I took hours to do it and also arranged it as you requested. This is the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Emil_Cerda

I accept your suggestions to remove or put some words

Eltiguere300 (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Eltiguere300[reply]

Review one more time, added references

Hello Sulfurboy, thank you for reviewing my draft article Daniel_Sonenberg. I'm still new at this, and published it too soon, but much later than I had hoped! I have just added some outside references and would like to have your advice as I relearn the Wikipedia way after a couple of years away. I am still editing the draft, and will continue to add to it in the coming weeks until it will hopefully be accepted. Lori Arsenault, Gorham, Maine (talk) 05:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's unclear what your question is...Sulfurboy (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cuis_Smalltalk

Greetings,

I must admit that I do not understand the rejection.

Cuis Smalltalk is frequently mentioned along with siblings Squeak and Pharo, both of which have web pages.

Searching GitHub for "Cuis-Smalltalk-*" shows ~30 repositories.

There are a number YouTube videos of Smalltalk conference talks on Cuis (ESUG, FAST).

There is at least one university with its own Cuis development image and Google group [1].

There is an active, vibrant development community using Cuis Smalltalk.

Cuis has different goals from Squeak and Pharo which has resulted in a significantly different dialect and technical structure. For example, the visual artifacts (Morphs) have origins relative to their containers rather than the screen origin, x@y positions use floats not integers, Features check their requirements and autoload them. IDE tools differ. Cuis is a different dialect of Smalltalk and deserves respect and attention in WIkipedia.

It is not like Cuis Smalltalk does not exist. Why allow Squeak and Pharo pages but not Cuis?

Please help me understand this, -Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeFilmore (talk • contribs) 16:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I never stated the subject isn't notable, I stated the sources don't denote notability. I would highly recommend reading the articles that were linked in the decline message. Some of your comments indicate to me that you haven't done so yet. If after reading those articles, in particular WP:GNG and WP:RS, you still have questions I will be happy to help with any further questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stasher Brand

Hi Sulfurboy,

I wanted to get your feedback on the Stasher page you declined and said it came across as too promotional. If you had any feedback, comments or edits that I can work off of that would be extremely helpful.

Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chistina.mlynski#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Stasher_Brand_%28February_18%29 Chistina.mlynski (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend reading the pages that were linked in the decline message. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My draft “which is always rejected”

all sources come from (national news websites in Indonesia)? Kebajikan111 (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's accurate enough, without having to look at other sources. all sources come from trusted website "local languages" because these foods are still poorly known outside the country Kebajikan111 (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

itu bukan “cookbook” tapi penjelasan tentang makanannya Kebajikan111 (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it's not a "cook book" but an explanation of the food Kebajikan111 (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

obviously that's an important topic! Kebajikan111 (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This food is known in Indonesia. but not known in the outside world. that's normal, foreigners don't even know our national food like rendang sate (maybe it's quite well known), but Gado-gado? unknown but that's our national dish. Kebajikan111 (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

btw, that food is already listed in local Wikipedia (wikipedia bahasa indonesia) Kebajikan111 (talk) 20:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Goes Wrong Show

Hi, just letting you know that I started this article, and not JHIMarket (who you left a message for when you left a comment). However, he did accidentally submit it previously, so it is an understandable mistake. Thanks, Thatone~~weird~~wikier Say hi 21:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sulfurboy: The redirect blocking this draft has been removed, can you press the magic button please. Thanks. - X201 (talk) 14:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - X201 (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:MasterCard Foundation

Hello, I started this new article and it was declined by another reviewer, I discussed with him and he suggested that I resubmit and find(wait) for another person to review it, would you please take the time to read through and review the submission?. Thanks! LilaMorillo (talk) 23:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions declined

Hello, Sulfurboy,

I declined several pages you had tagged as "uncontroversial speedy deletions" because they didn't include much information to justify a page deletion. If you want to delete a page because a different page needs to be moved to that location, please state which page needs to be moved. "Uncontroversial housekeeping" doesn't state a reason why a page should be deleted unless there is an obvious misspelling or mistake. Please be more specific in your deletion rationales and only use CSD G6 for pages that are uncontroversial and obvious deletion candidates. Otherwise, please use one of the other established CSD criteria. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, Hmm, can you point me to an example or two? I haven't run into anyone having issue with my G6s before. Is the problem just that I'm not giving the name of the page? I always state that it's to move in an article from AfC, I just assumed it was pretty inherent which page was being moved in since they would have to share the same name. But I can just start directly putting in the draft link, that's no biggie. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not on a computer that is great for editing so I'll ask that you look at my contributions. There are 3 that I declined. Admins vary in how strict they are about speedy deletions and I'd guess I'm medium strict (or I just request fuller information with requested page moves). Others rarely raise any questions and just delete so you might not have encountered questions in the past, it depends on how much tagging you do. Let me know if you have any other questions. I just thought since there were 3 CSD G6 I declined, I should drop you a note. It's a especially tricky criteria because it requires the tagger to state why the page should be deleted where with the other criteria, they are more self-explanatory. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

page about Efim Levitin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tweenata — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweenata (talk • contribs) 02:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sulfurboy,

Thank you very much for your review and for the comments on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tweenata

I am not asking you to re-review the article by any means, but just wanted to emphasize that Efim Levitin had published many books on radio engineering which were very popular in USSR. Many had a very large circulation, some were printed 2 or 3 times, and one of the books, printed in 1960s is still listed in an online book shop as a antique hardcopy (out of print) ;) His books were used as reference materials by all the repair personnel as well as amateurs. His books were also translated into several languages.

He did a lot to popularize radio engineering in USSR and some amateur radio engineers even now are still using his books.

Just wanted to add that since, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics), having published books counts (although I admit that I do not know whether his books were actually used in any Soviet higher education institutions).

He is not very well researched, and therefore at this point I do not have any additional secondary sources to be listed. I will keep looking, but unfortunately I do not have access to any Soviet archives. Perhaps, having this article in Wikepedia would allow people who have the information to come forward and add it.

Thank you again for your consideration.

Best,

tweenataTweenata (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Tweenata (talk) 13:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

talk page post that wasn't made under a new section

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Josef_Veselka_(Cardiologist)

how many citation do you need? There are a lot of page on wiki that have less numbers of citation and it is ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmporaHotels (talk • contribs) 15:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If other citations are missing tags you are welcome to tag them with maintence tags. What other pages look like have no bearing on yours. You need to have inline citations for each claim made within the article as it is a biography of a living person. This is all fully explained in the links provided in the decline message. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hannes Bieger draft

Hey, thanks for your message regarding my Hannes Bieger submission --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hannes_Bieger

Would love to know more about why it was declined, if possible.

And any tips on how to improve it.

Thanks! Much love, Marcus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgoldenbarnes (talk • contribs) 15:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review the links provided in the decline message. In particular, we need to see secondary and reliable sources that give the subject significant coverage. You want to make sure the coverage isn't WP:ROUTINE. Primary sources can be used, but they aren't enough to denote notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sulfurboy, thank you for reviewing my article. I got a notice saying it was declined, because it would read more as an advertisement then as an independent article. I made some changes, wrote it from a more natural point of view and added references. I hope I fixed it. Should I send it in for review again?

This is the article I am talking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vera_Luijendijk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brigittevandam (talk • contribs) 15:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Buildbox games article

Hey Sulfurboy,

Thanks for reviewing my proposed article. Can you please explain why the subject is not sufficient for a separate article?

Unity as well as Unreal both have separate article for "List of games" besides their main article please see below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unity_games?action=edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unreal_Engine_games#See_also

Looking forward hearing back from you.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katieee123 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alphacode draft

hi, sulfurboy!

you reviewed my article about the alphacode programming language (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alphacode), I saw you denied it because it had some problems with the references, can you maybe tell me whats wrong. why you denied it and what i should change?

tyvm ~luc de wit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukedewit (talk • contribs) 18:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend reading the links provided in the decline message. Doing so will make it abundantly clear what needs to be done. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GS-Calc

Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:GS-Calc. I added a few references and removed the "very compact" words (if this was a problem).
Jerryp.c5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerryp.c5 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello Sulfurboy recently I did edits on my article Ntinda Vocational Training Institute, but declined. Please I request your help in pin pointing the references which are not reliable.--Sandrah.Akol (talk) 04:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for burning the midnight oil! A little coffee break for you!

Dear Sulfurboy,

Thank you for reviewing my proposed Wikipedia article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jei_Atacama. I am so very grateful to you for the very fast response after hitting "publish" on the draft yesterday. Even though some might be discouraged by a rejection, I am ready for the challenge of editing and getting this right! :) This is my first Wikipedia page submission and seeing the statement that noted it might be at least 6 months before anyone would be able to review the draft because of the long queue was a scary realization. Your response is encouraging and I can dig in again and learn and edit! Thanks for all you do (I see you are very very busy on here!). See you at the Tea House ... in the meantime, hope this cup of coffee helps to fuel your passion for Wikipedia.

Best, PamelaAnnCruz PamelaAnnCruz (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohammadreza_Goodary#2_news_website_and_one_relevant_wikipedia_entry_references_were_added_to_the_reference_list

Hi Sulfurboy, Thank you for your review. I added three more references for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohammadreza_Goodary#2_news_website_and_one_relevant_wikipedia_entry_references_were_added_to_the_reference_list

Would appreciate your review. Thank you--Abmousavi (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:36:42, 20 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Jingleman2

Jingleman2 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dan Shafer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Jingleman2 (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand your not excepting. It is the exact format as Frank Simms and several others including Sundance Head, and others from the Voice who do not have ANY published sources. everything I did is as accurate as one can get and NOT just passing mentions. Have a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Simms. If you need others who are set up exactly the same [lease let me know. ALL of which have been published!

I'm not sure what you're talking about with other articles, that's of no concern to me and it should be with you either. We instead need to go by wikipedia policy. So far, the subject of your article wholly fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Someone that only is shown to have coverage from WP:ONEVENT (in this case being on the voice) is usually never determined to be notable. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

Hi! Thanks for your very helpful feedback. I've gone through and added numerous inline citations, as requested. If more are needed, could you possibly notate where you think they should be? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Daniel_K._Podolsky,_M.D. Thank you! 22:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Kshear04 (talk) kshear04

Looks good. Approved. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU!!! --Kshear04 (talk) 22:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC) kshear04[reply]

Obituary and further notoriety for Maynard Hubbard Salmon II

Here is the obituary for Maynard Hubbard Salmon II. http://www.scdailypress.com/site/2019/03/12/conservationist-author-salmon-dead-at-73/ Also, here is a more current article noting Wild and Scenic river designation in his name for his work http://scdailypress.com/site/2020/01/18/moving-forward-federal-wild-and-scenic-legislation-pays-tribute-to-author-environmentalist/ CherieSalmon (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added two new obituaries, one from the Syracuse Post Standard and one from the New Mexico Wildlife Federation's Outdoor Reporter. Hopefully these are more reliable sources. I also added a line about the current legislation working it's way through the U.S. Senate with two news articles. Thanks for your help! CherieSalmon (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passu Tshering

Hi,

I would like to understand why you have deleted the article I created on Passu Tshering, due to notability issues, notably lack of quality references. The references include two prominent Bhutanese independent newspapers - Kuensel and The Bhutanese. There are two independent books, one published by Routledge, an internationally recognised academic publisher. Please can you explain to me why these do not meet criteria of reliable, published sources. Also, two of the references are to profiles of Passu and his organisation, so I dont think they can be considered passing mentions. Thanks. 17todotest (talk) 02:39, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

page for Jarrett Walker

I am not necessarily mad, but I am confused when you say he is a "clear cut case" of someone famous for one thing. Am I supposed to summarize his book and his contributions to the field of transit planning? I am new to Wikipedia but I am not new to the subjects he is famous for (and I'd bet you are the opposite) so there needs to be some more fleshed-out exchange of info. [2]

Commented on your question at the help desk. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Women's Football at the 2003 South Pacific Games Review

Hello,

Cheers for reviewing my draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Women%27s_Football_at_the_2003_South_Pacific_Games).

While I can accept that the subject does not show significant coverage, the additional coverage from the OFC themselves are dead links these days. I'd also point out that the same subject on the men's side has been up for years (and is reliable from what I can tell) with a total lack of sources stated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_at_the_2003_South_Pacific_Games_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_tournament. As this article would then complete all of the articles on the women's football tournaments at the Pacific Games, I felt it was valid of an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratkiller75 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What WP:OTHER pages exist has no bearing on whether or not your page should exist. You need to show how that particular year was notable enough to deserve its own article separate of the South Pacific Games article. Wikipedia is not just a menagerie of sports results. If there is not significant coverage of that particular year, then you've just answered your own question. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:LinkSquares

Hi Sulfurboy

Thanks for taking the time to review my article Draft:LinkSquares. I would like to improve this article and get it into a shape you believe is suitable for publication. I'm wondering if it is the nature of the sources? I did not cite all sources possible, so if for instance I included a citation from the Berkshire Hathaway owned Business Wire, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190307005489/en/LinkSquares-AI-Startup-Tackling-Contract-Analytics-Raises would that be sufficient? If I am misunderstanding the issue, please let me know!

Blackmetalheater (talk) 12:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise reading the articles that were linked to you in the decline message. Doing so will teach why, for example, the article you linked above isn't a good one. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declining Sandbox When Draft Is In Draft Space

Do not type Draft: in front of the title of a draft when using the 'duplicate' option to decline a sandbox. The script automatically puts Draft: in front of the title, so that this duplicates Draft:Draft:, and results in a red link. See User:MariaKravitzF/sandbox, where you did this.

Thank you for reviewing, and for dealing with a large amount of various sorts of crud. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, Oops! Thanks for pointing that out. I think I've always done it that way, so no telling how many I've messed up lol. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It isn't intuitive. Discovering that the script does that is strictly trial and error. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kahootz (software company)

Hi, Sulfurboy! I've read your comments on the reasons you declined the company and found them reasonable. It doesn't look I can do much more about it as I haven't found more sources about the company. Should I leave as it is or remove the draft? I'm not a very frequent user, so sorry in advance for any delayed response. Also, thanks a lot for invitation to the Teahouse - looks promising=)). I would appreciate your advice on my contributions. With regard, Michael.--MichaelGrossmanjr (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]