Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prolific poets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of prolific poets

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interesting, but in the end no real definition of "prolific" exists, and the term is used liberally by sources, making this an ill-defined or even undefined list. Wikipedia alone has 177 "prolific poets"[1], and many more who we don't list as such are given this description in reliable sources (e.g. C. S. Lewis [2] or Jorge Luis Borges [3] or Langston Hughes [4]. Fram (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the title of article to List of most prolific poets and added a few names. Nikolai Kurbatov (talk) 14:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete the line of "prolific" is not a standard defition, so there is no clear inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "Most prolific" is too ill-defined and vague for this ever have clear enough inclusion criteria to make a useful list. Rorshacma (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above. If we have reliably sourced numbers for people, and if most prolific poets is treated as a group, we could have something more objective like a list of poets by number of published poems. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.