Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium

Disaster management Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Start‑class Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Pulmonology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force.

Viruses Start‑class Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

COVID-19 Start‑class Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Section sizes

Section size for COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium (52 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	7,592	7,592
Background	3,124	3,124
Timeline	93	54,273
February 2020 – first case	4,631	4,631
March 2020 – spread	31,885	31,885
April 2020 – first peak	2,588	2,588
May 2020	382	382
June 2020	271	271
July 2020	1,070	1,070
August to September 2020 – resurgence	5,013	5,013
October 2020 to April 2021 – return to lockdown	2,993	2,993
May to October 2021 – easing of lockdown	962	962
October 2021 to March 2022 – new restrictions	4,385	4,385
Government response	24	63,001
Authorities	2,517	2,517
Containment measures	10,066	10,066
Medical supplies and testing strategy	4,173	4,173
Exit strategy	640	640
Communications	8,983	8,983
Criticism	16	36,598
Handling of the crisis	8,355	8,355
Shortage of medical supplies	10,923	10,923
Situation in care homes	6,924	6,924
High death toll and unusual method of counting	10,380	10,380
Other responses	20	17,955
Healthcare sector and Belgian research	11,988	11,988
Belgian industry	5,947	5,947
Impact	11	15,103
Politics	6,120	6,120
Economics	4,700	4,700
Society and environment	4,272	4,272
Statistics	15	71,688
Definitions	200	11,551
Confirmed infections	1,928	1,928
Recoveries	3,289	3,289
Deaths	4,748	6,134
Notable people	1,386	1,386
By location	2,549	2,549
Graphs	605	57,573
Total cases in Belgium (cumulative)	17,036	17,036
7-day running average for daily new cases, hospitalisations, discharges and deaths	3,752	3,752
Confirmed new cases per day	10,673	10,673
Confirmed deaths per day	9,075	9,075
Tests and new confirmed cases per day in Belgium (March to September 2020)	5,008	5,008
Change of hospitalisations per day in Belgium (March to May 2020)	2,366	2,366
Active cases in hospital per day (incl. ) (March to September 2020)	4,833	4,833
Confirmed new cases per day by region	2,598	2,598
Logistic growth models	1,627	1,627
See also	224	224
Notes	34	34
References	28	28
External links	892	892
Total	233,914	233,914

Why quote the pages in Flemish here?

The quoted pages on www.info-coronavirus.be are available in Netherlands, French and English. As this pages is intended for native English speakers, the politeness would be to quote pages in that language when they are available. For example, https://www.info-coronavirus.be/en/news is better here than https://www.info-coronavirus.be/nl/news/ even if there is a delay for the English version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpilotte (talk • contribs) 11:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free and adapt it in this way. And by the way: the quotes are in Dutch, not in Flemish. And "Netherlands" doesn't not exist as a languange. --Tfa1964 (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only the Dutch and French version of this government site are regularly updated, whereas the English and German part only get sporadic updates, and not all articles are translated (e.g. look at the site, as of time of writing, the English and German part say nothing about the 3 deaths, whereas the Dutch and French version do). Therefore, quoting the site in Dutch and French would be better in my opinion. I get what you mean with this, but knowing how relevant information, especially for this pandemic, comes in fast, it's a necessary evil to keep the page updated to it's fullest extent Kef274 (talk) 07:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject COVID-19

I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong graph of deaths?

According to these sources: COVID-19 - EPIDEMIOLOGISCH BULLETIN NL and COVID-19 - BULLETIN EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE FR the graph 'Confirmed deaths per day in Belgium' is not correct. What is the cause? Where the reported statistics in the past wrong and is this corrected by governement afterwards? Or what is the source of the current graph? --PJ Geest (talk) 09:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and I have verified the numbers on the archived copies of the official bulletin in french and in dutch, as well as the press conferences now added daily on youtube, and corrected the counts accordingly. However it feels like we have too many redundant copies of the same numbers, I had to correct 3 tables/charts. --Redturnips (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raw data IC patients

Concerning these two sources: COVID-19 - EPIDEMIOLOGISCH BULLETIN NL ^[1] COVID-19 - BULLETIN EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE FR ^[2].

I would like to have the raw numbers on the first graph on page 3. I would also like to now if the IC numbers are the amount of current IC cases. I.e. if they are corrected for people who got out of IC.

Using this data I want to construct two graphs: - Amount of current patients in IC per day. I believe this is a better reflection of the current hit our healthcare system is taking. - Amount of new patients in IC per day. I believe this is a better reflection of the total amount of people infected. As you would expect a certain percentage of people infected to be hit hard enough to be held in IC.

I believe these two graphs would be better indicators than the amount of confirmed cases, as these numbers highly depend on how much and whom the government is testing.

[1] ttps://epidemio.wiv-isp.be/ID/Documents/Covid19/Meest%20recente%20update.pdf

[2] ttps://epidemio.wiv-isp.be/ID/Documents/Covid19/Derni%c3%a8re%20mise%20%c3%a0%20jour%20de%20la%20situation%20%c3%a9pid%c3%a9miologique.pdf

[1]

[2]