Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Aryal (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Yunshui (talk | contribs) at 08:24, 26 March 2020 (→‎Sagar Aryal: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  08:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sagar Aryal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to be notable (see previous AFD for detailed rationale). This article was refunded by (who I'm sure is a COI) editor and left alone after adding another batch of bad refs. My WP:BEFORE still couldn't dig enough (read any) evidence of notability. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 05:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Working from the bottom of the ref section up, I found several of the sources don’t even mention him. However there are clearly some sources. Whether they’re enough to support a BLP or not I’m less sure. Mccapra (talk) 05:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 06:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.