Jump to content

User talk:Renerpho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Synchronist (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 16 April 2020 (fix format). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Space Barnstar

The Space Barnstar
For being an early contributor to the 2I/Borisov article. ↠Pine () 06:07, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pine: Thank you! Renerpho (talk) 07:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finding minor-planet names in MPC-publications

Hi Renerpho, there is a tool that might assist you finding a specific name among the many Minor Planet Circulars (website). For example, MPC's object page for (4388) Jurgenstock displays the Reference page number (36126). The tool maps this number to the corresponding publishing date (28 September 1999), and from there on it's easy to find the corresponding M.P.C. For 4388 Jürgenstock, page 362 (M.P.C. 36126), the name has been published with an umlaut. Hope that was informative. Rfassbind – talk 03:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, we both registered on Wikipedia just 12 days apart. What a coincidence! Rfassbind – talk 03:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Rfassbind! I have since contacted the MPC, to ask why there are two conflicting names on the website.[1] JPL finds the object when looking for Jurgenstock, but not Jürgenstock. I was informed that the page titles on both the MPC and JPL do not display umlauts by default. P.S. Nice coincidence about our Wikipedia age (even though I wasn't very active for the first few years). Renerpho (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Would you mind if I submit 2007 OR10 for peer review? I believe it is ready to be a featured article candidate soon. By the way, thanks for your contributions to the article!. Nrco0e (talk) 06:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am sceptical about the feasibility of FA at this point, but WP:GA may be within reach. I have no objection against submitting to PR, but I'd recommend to make GA status the primary goal. Renerpho (talk) 16:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the awesome image

This is a very useful image of the TNOs known today. Well done!

KBOs and resonances
KBOs and resonances

Thanks for contributing it to the emergent encyclopedia of human knowledge! N2e (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@N2e: Thank you! I plan to update it regularly as more objects/classifications become available. Renerpho (talk) 01:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have a second, related image. While the first one makes the resonances more apparent, the classifications (cubewano, scattered, etc) are more transparent in this one (IMO):

KBOs and resonances
KBOs and resonances

Renerpho (talk) 01:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's a helpful view. Thanks for sharing it.
It's always amazing to me how good graphical presentation can make difficult-to-grok data on the real (and complex) world more clear. N2e (talk) 04:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

47171 Lempo image

Hi Renerpho, could you upload a processed Hubble image of the 47171 Lempo system with all three components resolved? The artice's infobox image is quite old and the third component of the Lempo system hasn't been discovered at the time, and I figured that you can help replace the old image with a better one since you've uploaded a processed image of Huya and its satellite. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 00:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can try, but the third component is difficult to resolve. Renerpho (talk) 11:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hubble images of the Lempo/Hiisi system, with the two components marked "1" and "2"

Done. Renerpho (talk) 12:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC) An image with all three components resolved doesn't work well. I decided against it, instead adding an image to the section about the individual components.12:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Michael Boddenberg

Hello, Renerpho,

Thank you for creating Michael Boddenberg.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add one or more sources that verify the content in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MrClog: Thanks, I added additional sources and removed the tag.Renerpho (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A humor barnstar for you

Humor Barnstar!
Congrats for winning the contest. Here's your reward. Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020

OcelotCreeper (talk) 17:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for helping with some distraction. Times aren't easy. We can all need a good laugh! Renerpho (talk) 17:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A WikiYanny, First Class with Invisible Oak Clusters for you!

A WikiYanny, First Class with Invisible Oak Clusters for you!
Awarded for your incredible work documenting the unfolding Great Edit War of 2020. Your speed and thoroughness were nothing short of awe-inspiring. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Spirit of Eagle. I'm a bit sad I missed the finale, but you handled it well without me. 😉 I'm not looking forward to do this ever again, but only because I hope I'm never again stuck at home like this! It was all good fun though, thanks again! Renerpho (talk) 02:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed I made almost 800 edits for this. 😮 Renerpho (talk) 02:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for marvelous job udating Tabby's Star plot!

Renerpho, thanks for the marvelous job you've done updating the consolidated plot of Tabby's Star dimmings! And thanks to Bruce Gary for the data!