User talk:JungerMan Chips Ahoy!

Confused about reversion

I realize I didn't log in when I made a change to the Western Wall article that you reverted, but I can't figure out why the change I made was a disimprovement. All I did was make the link to the controversial Haj Amin al-Husseini actually link to him, and put a space between the link and the next word. Happy to engage--my wikipedia account is Mellsworthy.

Thanks, M. Ellsworth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mellsworthy (talk • contribs) 23:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Screen (sports), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Orthoepy (talk) 02:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was constructive. thanks just the same. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 03:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JungerMan Chips Ahoy!. You have new messages at Orthoepy's talk page.
Message added 20:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Irgun

Instead of joining an edit war, please join the discussion of Category:Resistance movements at Talk:Irgun. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

— Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Informing others of errors

Hey there! I saw that you informed another individual that one of their edits was of poor quality (or marked as vandalism). For the sake of clarity, would you mind putting those comments under the October 2015 section? With the chronological comments, it is easier to track vandalism. Thanks! Let me know if you have any questions!

-TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of what I am referring to above -TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It was an automated warning generated by the STiki tool. But I can go back and put it into its own section. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 21:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 2nd thought, that's going to be a lot of work. Why can't the tool do this automatically? JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can totally use any tool to prevent and revert vandalism, and inform users of their offenses. However, it's honestly not very difficult to create a new section, apx 16 characters in length

-TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JungerMan Chips Ahoy!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Khamenei - copyright violations

Hi. A user removed several sourced paragraphs in the article about ayatollah Kahemeni because of copyright problems. I rewrote the content in different words in order for an extended confirmed user to restore it. Please, would you mind taking care of it? (thank you very much): Talk:Ali Khamenei#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2017 (2)--190.137.18.52 (talk) 00:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this was already done by someone else. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 16:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JungerMan Chips Ahoy!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

prior accounts

Have you ever used another account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 18:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how their first edit with this account in over two years is to oppose Floq’s RfA, I would think that is exceedingly likely. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know why you haven't answered this question? And I am especially interested in how you got interested in the Baqoura /Naharayim-articles, (which have less that 10 views per day)? (Though I note that User:Here come the Suns was quite active on the talk-page, back in the day) Huldra (talk) 22:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 16:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 09:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal

The case for removal of illegal is strong on multiple accounts. If you disagree open a talk page discussion for it. I'm here every day and look forward to workin with you for the next weeks and months ahead. Happy to engage in a 30-day RfC if you so wish any time. -- GreenC 02:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one edit warring over this content, you are. You need to open a talk page discussion for it. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 02:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Rhodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 —Paleo Neonate – 20:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 19:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Occupy from?

Just curious why both you and Zarcademan seem to think that standard English expressions like "x occupied y" somehow means "Occupied from". Where does the "from" enter into it? Is this an artifact of some language other than English? Selfstudier (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You just need to read a little more carefully. The text I revised originally read "When Israel occupied the Golan Heights from Syria in 1967", So I got the idea the person who wrote that meant "occupied from" from the text they entered that read "occupied from". JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Well, you were correct to alter the original because the "from Syria" bit is not needed.Selfstudier (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude

First off, thx for assistance in some regards for example 1R in my talk page... Secondly, is there a way to make a guideline on Wikipedia? All this discussion about “occupation”... if there was a guideline that said only to use that word in relation to governance instead of the physical act, I feel it would go a long way toward cutting out confusion about when and where correct to use the obviously politically loaded word. Any assistance appreciated thank you Zarcademan123456 (talk) 04:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I am happy to help.

What is sometimes done is the creation of an "FAQ" section or note on the talk page of the relevant article, for example here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antisemitism - the note about Arabs being semitres. I am personally not a big fan of such guides, or mandatory boilerplates that prescribe particular language to use or not use. JungerMan Chips Ahoy! (talk) 13:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thx for heads up Zarcademan123456 (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a sock?

The usual suspects are at it again, so feel free to defend yourself. If you are a sock or if you're not a sock. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NoCal100 Sir Joseph ^(talk) 14:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]