Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Khalife

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Spartaz (talk | contribs) at 21:38, 8 May 2020 (→‎George Khalife: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

George Khalife (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than vapid celebrity gossip (ie. Look what this hunky guy got his supermodel wife as a push gift!) there is no coverage of Khalife or his company. Praxidicae (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
so hot right now! Praxidicae (talk) 14:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep, the sources provided include numerous business mags which show that the jeweller has significant coverage online which make it passable for gng. The tone could also be changed as well. Mr. Apollo (talk to me bebe) 01:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)sock strike Praxidicae (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources specifically? Praxidicae (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the sources mostly look like tabloid promo nonsense to me, maybe with a few scattered industry magazines, but I don't think those altogether look like enough either. 67.243.20.177 (talk) 01:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.