Jump to content

Talk:Logo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 141.156.181.66 (talk) at 00:21, 10 May 2020 (→‎recursivity: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

“completely abstract”, “brandmark”, “ideograph”

  • This article: Ideographs, such as Chase Bank, are completely abstract forms
  • Another article: The Chase logo is a stylized representation of the primitive water pipes laid by the Manhattan Company

This is conflicting, isn't it? A completely abstract logo is e.g. the one for the Norwegian University of Science and Technology by Bruno Oldani. He has stated that the logo “contains no major symbolism” (in Norwegian).

Also, the term brandmark redirects here, but isn't mentioned. Should it be?

Finally, should the term ideograph, which is used, be defined or have a link elsewhere?

Bjornte (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the whole article could do with a cohesive rewrite, if you make a start I shall try and help Unibond (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ENDALKACHEW DEMELASH IMPORT & EXPORT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.111.6 (talk) 09:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cancelled for the time being.

Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2020

The types of logo is not detailed in here, For example Monogram logos (or lettermarks) Wordmarks (or logotypes) Pictorial marks (or logo symbols) Abstract logo marks Mascots The combination mark  The emblem 106.200.197.238 (talk) 02:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ToThAc (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

recursivity

Under the image of the VOC logo, the link to "corporate logo" is this article! don't think that's useful!