User talk:PanzaMain
This is PanzaMain's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Plastiq Inc. has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)PanzaMain, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi PanzaMain! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC) |
Paid editing disclosure
Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status, this is a start but is not sufficient. WP:PAID requires that you provide links to your profiles on all sites where you "advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services" to fully comply with the policy. GSS 💬 18:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Seriously unfair block
PanzaMain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't understand why have I been blocked and my draft that was recently approved removed. It seems too unfair, and I need more explanation. I don't know what the problem is with editting for Plastiq, I did use this draft as base but cleaned up tone and sources that I did not think was reliable[1].. I followed every guideline to include my draft. PanzaMain (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@RoySmith: @Zanimum: @GSS: I don't advertise, I happen to know one person working for plastiq team and he mentioned the company was trying to have a new wikipedia page. PanzaMain (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Yamla: Okay I need help, I am not sure how to convice you. I am being accussing without any proof I've done anything wrong.