Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subscription business model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DMySon 04:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subscription business model

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Talk page issues on reliable sources dated back up to 2012. No improvment on reliable sources has been made since then WP:DEL#7. Contains Original Research. Nightvour (talk) 02:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep in the name of WP:NOTCLEANUP. I doubt this is WP:TNT-bad, and serching shows it endless explained and discussed. Mangoe (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:IMPERFECT. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:NOTCLEANUP. --Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 15:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per common sense. This is obviously a notable topic for which the article needs improvement, not deletion. Why, just a couple of days ago I had to provide direct debit instructions to the Zoological Society of London to enable me and my wife to take our grandson to Whipsnade and Regent's Park zoos as often as we want, and examples of this business model appear all over the place. The only problem is in deciding which sources to use, not whether they exist. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.