Talk:PSA Certified

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 April 2020 by reviewer JavaHurricane (talk · contribs).

Internet Start‑class Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology Start‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Computer Security: Computing Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

RichardDigital47 (talk · contribs) has been paid by PSA Certified.

initial review under new article curation / review process

Thank you for creating PSA Certified.

While examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start! I tagged it because the article is really short on independent secondary sources. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing. Sincerely,

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020 Edit Request

Thanks for your assistance so far @North8000: and @JavaHurricane:. As you both mentioned the references could do with some improvement, so there is an updated version in User:RichardDigital47/sandbox I would ask to be considered. It strips out the primary references and focuses on media coverage, so it is hopefully an improvement on what is there already. In an ideal world, this will address the notices at the top of the page. If it doesn't, it would be great to be pointed in the right direction.

RichardDigital47 (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kind of buried right now plus some compute problems are limiting my wiki time. I did a quick look and it looks like you added some good references. You don't necessarily have to remove the primary ones, but need to rely on them less to support the text. Make sure you develop some text from those new sources (I didn't review that in your draft). IMO if you just get this moved a few steps in the right direction it would be enough to remove the top level tags, even if some further improvement is needed. Again, I'm just doing quick stuff right now, but ping me if I can help. North8000 (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that edits be made to the following semi-protected articles:

D (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
A (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Following discussions with North8000 and JavaHurricane, I have made an edit suggestion to further improve the PSA Certified page. There is a new version to be considered here. There are two main aims with this. To improve referencing so the notices can be removed at the top of the page and the second is to add more technical information.RichardDigital47 (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RichardDigital47: I just took a look and am not seeing any huge red flags. Given the work that you'd done with Java and North previously, and because of the substantial changes, you should probably go ahead and do the edits yourself for attribution purposes. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49: Thanks for looking at the draft and your feedback. The content is now live on the page as instructed.RichardDigital47 (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]