Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean de Silva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No valid reason given for deletion Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sean de Silva

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Arunjithp (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Arunjithp (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, played for the national team of his country, has received considerable attention in newspapers in his country as well (e.g. here and here), and (at the moment) no deletion reason is presented (which, if not changed, makes this a speedy keep candidate). Fram (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for all the reasoned mentioned by Fram, should be kept- and speedy kept if no deletion rationale is given. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Played international football, easily passes the threshold for WP:NFOOTBALL and if the article is cleaned up, sources added sure GNG would also be set. It's a strange nom as nothing is stated in the nomination which appears to be a disruptive nomination. Govvy (talk) 11:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - clearly notable. Nominator has clearly not checked the relevant guidelines or the article before nominating. Giant Snowman 11:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NFOOTY; nominator does not seem to have provided a rationale for their nomination, and may not have checked the criteria for inclusion. Eagleash (talk) 11:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. International players, meets NFOOTY.--Mvqr (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, passes WP:NFOOTY Deathlibrarian (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.