Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Schueler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Eddie891 (talk | contribs) at 19:10, 9 September 2020 (→‎Betty Schueler: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Schueler[edit]

Betty Schueler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A wife-and-husband team of non-notable occult writers who both appear to fail WP:BASIC and WP:NAUTHOR. I could not find any reviews of their books. There is some coverage for a Betty Schueler who was a union organizer at BWI Airport, but I'm pretty sure these are different people.

I am also nominating Gerald Schueler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) together with this nomination, as they appear to have written virtually all their books jointly and do not appear to differ substantially as regards available coverage. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 19:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.