Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuur Groete aan Mannetjies Roux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stuur Groete aan Mannetjies Roux

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this article among the remaining unreviewed content translations from 2016; see this discussion in 2016 for the history. Normally I would speedily move it to draft in accordance with this consensus, but User:Bradv has objected to this procedure, so here we are. I have yet to be convinced of this film's notability. —S Marshall T/C 13:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 13:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In addition to the existing source in the article, a Google search led me to just two pertinent sources, both of them reviews from the week of the film's release, this and this. For what it's worth, Rotten Tomatoes lists no reviews, though I don't know whether one would expect to find any there for a independent South African film. No indication of persistent note, falls well short of WP:GNG, and nothing to support WP:NFILM, as I think that at most one of the three writers (Diane de Beer) might be of national note. Largoplazo (talk) 14:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested the author of the original article (of which this is a translation) to try to provide additional information about the film -- references, reviews and reasons why it is notable. If they respond by adding anything to the original article, I will translate it and add it to this English version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hallakj (talk • contribs) 16:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the two full reviews identified above that show a likelihood of passing WP:GNG and possibly criteria 1 of WP:NFILM in my view,Atlantic306 (talk) 23:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.